2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-0675-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of CNV detection tools for NGS panel data in genetic diagnostics

Abstract: Although germline copy-number variants (CNVs) are the genetic cause of multiple hereditary diseases, detecting them from targeted next-generation sequencing data (NGS) remains a challenge. Existing tools perform well for large CNVs but struggle with single and multi-exon alterations. The aim of this work is to evaluate CNV calling tools working on gene panel NGS data and their suitability as a screening step before orthogonal confirmation in genetic diagnostics strategies. Five tools (DECoN, CoNVaDING, panelcn… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
86
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, in a few cases, we had incomplete genetic diagnosis when variants of uncertain significance or single heterozygous variants in two PCD genes were detected, suggesting the possibility of digenic inheritance, although further studies are required to establish this with certainty. In addition, testing for the presence of copy number variants (CNVs) was not performed due to the limitation of existing tools to detect single‐ or multi‐exon alterations (Moreno‐Cabrera et al, 2020). It is possible that CNVs could explain at least some of the unresolved cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in a few cases, we had incomplete genetic diagnosis when variants of uncertain significance or single heterozygous variants in two PCD genes were detected, suggesting the possibility of digenic inheritance, although further studies are required to establish this with certainty. In addition, testing for the presence of copy number variants (CNVs) was not performed due to the limitation of existing tools to detect single‐ or multi‐exon alterations (Moreno‐Cabrera et al, 2020). It is possible that CNVs could explain at least some of the unresolved cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ICO cohort, genetic testing was performed on genomic DNA using the nextgeneration sequencing (NGS) custom panel I2HCP, which comprises 122-135 hereditary cancer (HC)-associated genes, depending on the version used [21]. Copy number analysis was performed from NGS data using DECoN [22] with parameter optimization [23]. Copy number variants (CNVs) in BARD1 were validated using custom multiplex ligationdependent probe amplification (MLPA) probes designed according to the instructions provided by MRC-Holland.…”
Section: Ngs Panel Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most important is read-depth which indicates the number of separate copies of the same sequence that are read during the test. 8,9 If there are enough reads to allow a comparison of read depth between different sequences within a gene or regions within a chromosome, a change in copy number can be detected. Not all HTS platforms are able to detect CNVs and this is an important consideration for laboratories when selecting which technology to use.…”
Section: Comparison Of Sequencing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%