2014
DOI: 10.1057/mel.2014.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of cold ironing and speed reduction policies to reduce ship emissions near and at ports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
92
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fagerholt et al (2015) also show that a likely effect of the regulations is that ship operators will choose to sail longer distances to avoid or reduce the sailing distances within the ECAs. Nevertheless, the main finding in the literature is that slow-steaming results in substantial reductions in carbon emissions (see, for instance, Corbett et al, 2009;Wang and Meng, 2012;Maloni et al, 2013, Zis et al, 2014, Ferrari et al, 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fagerholt et al (2015) also show that a likely effect of the regulations is that ship operators will choose to sail longer distances to avoid or reduce the sailing distances within the ECAs. Nevertheless, the main finding in the literature is that slow-steaming results in substantial reductions in carbon emissions (see, for instance, Corbett et al, 2009;Wang and Meng, 2012;Maloni et al, 2013, Zis et al, 2014, Ferrari et al, 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the reduction of the vessel's speed leads to a straightforward reduction of the vessel's fuel costs, and thus shipping CO 2 emissions, slow steaming can significantly improve the shippers overall environmental footprint see for example (Zis et al 2008). For Normal Demand, and given that:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, based on the data from Stora Enso 2008 [8], the investment costs of an OPS for a connected ship and ports are $236,000 from ships at berth when on-board auxiliary generators are switched off and power demands are provided by shoreside electricity. Zis et al [35] indicated emission reductions of CO 2 (48~70%), SO 2 (3~60%), and NOx (40~60%) by supplying shore power to ships from the perspective of net emissions considering energy mixture, respectively. Hall [36] obtained that provision of shore power could reduce emissions of CO 2 , SO 2 , CO, and NOx by 25%, 46%, 76%, and 92%, respectively, when using shore power compared to on-board power generation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%