2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2019.113724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of commercially available three dengue rapid diagnostic test kits for diagnosis of acute dengue virus infection at the point-of-care setting in Myanmar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from significant recent evaluation studies [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], using RT-PCR as reference, are summarized in Table 3. These data confirm the variable performance observed in earlier studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from significant recent evaluation studies [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], using RT-PCR as reference, are summarized in Table 3. These data confirm the variable performance observed in earlier studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Screening of DENV infection (NS-1Ag, IgM and IgG) was performed in a point-of-care setting using CareUs Dengue Combo rapid test kit (WellsBio, Seoul, Korea) to detect DENV NS-1Ag, and IgM/IgG antibodies against DENV. This kit was validated for use in bedside settings in a previous study [ 7 ]. Following WHO recommendation, confirmation of DEN infection was done by a combination of different detection techniques such as virus isolation (gold standard), molecular method (RT-qPCR) and serological tests (NS-1 Ag, Anti-DENV IgM Ab).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous investigations on the use of the Wondfo RDT in field practice suggest that combing the malaria RDT with microscopy could increase both testing sensitivity and specificity [43]. Similarly, combining the NS1 antigen testing with serology-based assays for IgM and IgG may improve the accuracy of dengue diagnosis, particularly in areas with a lower prevalence of dengue transmission [44]. The large percentage of AFI patients hospitalized at the time of enrollment could reflect the clinical severity of the infection, project recruitment practices (e.g., more convenient blood draw), or presumed dengue diagnoses in which patients with dengue were admitted regardless of disease severity.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%