2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Continuous Improvement Techniques using Hybrid MCDM Technique under Fuzzy Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e different criteria, based on which the alternatives are rated, are decided and shown in Figure 2. e final ratings of the alternatives are determined using a single hybrid evaluation scheme of fuzzy AHP and VIKOR [7].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…e different criteria, based on which the alternatives are rated, are decided and shown in Figure 2. e final ratings of the alternatives are determined using a single hybrid evaluation scheme of fuzzy AHP and VIKOR [7].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a flawless design is administered by various factors, decision makers have to consider several other parameters similar to methodological or economical parameters, which have to be compromised in certain conditions. Fuzzy AHP, fuzzy VIKOR, and a combination of both can be used to evaluate different processes when several stakeholders are involved and when the values may not be quantifiable or discrete [7]. MCDM methods allow a decision maker to quantify particular criteria established on its reputation in the existence of supplementary objectives.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also known as Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), MCDM is a method that focuses on evaluating multiple criteria and multiple targets in decision-making to resolve overlapping or conflicting decision-making problems. In the context of management and information systems, MCDM is often used to filter and prioritize a cluster of criteria gathered from industry fields, and the process could yield both industry demand and methodology contributions [13,64,65].…”
Section: Multiple Criteria Decision Making (Mcdm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to prove the feasibility and practicability of the method proposed in this paper, we compare the alternative ranking obtained in the above illustrative example with the results of the classical MCGDM methods. rough literature review, we find that AHP is one of the earliest methods to deal with MCGDM problems [108]. TOPSIS and VIKOR as two commonly used and well-known comparative methods, which has similar calculation logic [109].…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%