2019
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of covariate effects on pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies in oncology

Abstract: Aims The development of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) requires an understanding of the interindividual variability (IIV) in pharmacokinetics (PK) at the population level facilitated by population PK (PopPK) modelling. However, there is no clear rationale for selecting which covariates to screen during PopPK model development. Here, we compare the effect of covariates on PK parameters for mAbs in oncology and identify the most commonly used covariates affecting PK parameters. Methods All 25 mAbs approved for the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
7
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Body weight, albumin, tumor size, sex, and country were identified as statistically significant covariates for intact trastuzumab deruxtecan. Trastuzumab deruxtecan clearance increases with increasing body weight; this is expected and consistent with current knowledge about monoclonal antibodies 22 . However, because trastuzumab deruxtecan is administered by weight‐based dosing (i.e., drug amount administered increases with increasing weight), the apparent net effect of increased body weight is slightly increased exposure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Body weight, albumin, tumor size, sex, and country were identified as statistically significant covariates for intact trastuzumab deruxtecan. Trastuzumab deruxtecan clearance increases with increasing body weight; this is expected and consistent with current knowledge about monoclonal antibodies 22 . However, because trastuzumab deruxtecan is administered by weight‐based dosing (i.e., drug amount administered increases with increasing weight), the apparent net effect of increased body weight is slightly increased exposure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Furthermore, the clearance reported in well-designed clinical PK studies, as used in this dataset, filters out the effect of ADA, either by focusing on the first weeks after first dosing in drug naïve subjects, or by the design of the PK study and analysis itself, excluding ADA positive subjects or by investigating ADA positivity as a covariate in a population PK analysis. 30,31 A high incidence of clearing ADA was not observed in clinical PK studies in drug-naïve subjects, for the fast clearing antibodies in our dataset. [32][33][34] As consequently we can exclude ADAs, we attribute the difference we observe (Figure 2a) to different sequence motifs or biophysical properties of the chimeric antibodies.…”
Section: Influence Of Antibody Origin and Isotype On Clearancementioning
confidence: 71%
“…PopPK models are widely used to determine the influence of different covariates, including body weight, on interindividual variability in PK [ 2 ]. PopPK models for trastuzumab consistently identified body weight [ 7 , 15 , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] ] or BMI [ 33 ] as a significant covariate for linear clearance (point estimate > 0.5 [ 1 ]) in HER2-positive EBC, MBC and metastatic gastric cancer (MGC).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimizing the therapeutic index across a target patient population requires understanding of the exposure–effect relationship and interindividual variability in the PK of the therapeutic [ 2 ]. The optimal efficacy of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) requires saturation of the accessible target sites [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%