2001
DOI: 10.1161/hs1101.098153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Cross-Sectional Luminal Morphology in Carotid Atherosclerotic Disease by Use of Spiral CT Angiography

Abstract: Background and Purpose-This study sought to determine the frequency of noncircular lumens in patients with significant carotid atherosclerotic disease and to evaluate the effect of noncircular lumens on stenosis measurement derived from angiographic projections. Methods-One hundred consecutive patients presenting with an internal carotid artery stenosis of at least 50% were imaged with spiral CT angiography. The transverse morphology of the diseased lumen was assessed on axial images, and the frequency of nonc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CTA is the only current angiographic method that allows such high-resolution images of contrast-filled vessels, plaque, and surrounding soft tissues. 21 Measurement of noncontrast-enhanced soft tissues is not without its challenge. Not only does the vessel wall need to be identified, but it needs to be separated from adjacent calcifications and plaque.…”
Section: Direct Cta Measurements and Ct Plaque Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CTA is the only current angiographic method that allows such high-resolution images of contrast-filled vessels, plaque, and surrounding soft tissues. 21 Measurement of noncontrast-enhanced soft tissues is not without its challenge. Not only does the vessel wall need to be identified, but it needs to be separated from adjacent calcifications and plaque.…”
Section: Direct Cta Measurements and Ct Plaque Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As imaging technologies advanced, alternatives to catheter DSA such as magnetic resonance angiography, Doppler ultrasound, and early CTA were intensively studied. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Nonetheless, these modalities all refer to catheter DSA and NASCET and ECST trials as standards to base their quantification methods as percentage stenosis, most often to NASCET.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence in the literature that the limited number of projections with DSA can lead to an underestimation of the actual stenosis owing to non-circular lumens [5]. On retrospective analysis, five out of these eight cases had non-circular lumens and may actually represent underestimation of stenosis by DSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Conventional digital subtraction X-ray angiography (DSA), ultrasound, CT angiography (CTA) and MR angiography (MRA) are the current methods of choice in clinical practice for evaluating the severity of carotid stenosis [3][4][5][6][7][8]. DSA, CTA and MRA primarily depict the arterial lumen, but generally provide little information concerning the diseased vessel wall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, longitudinal measurements may lead to a suboptimal evaluation of the hemodynamic meaning of the stenosis, at least in those (not unusual) cases where sectional morphology of arteries with plaques is irregular (7). Therefore, cross-sectional area would be a more accurate parameter than longitudinal measurements to infer the real residual blood flow velocities through a stenosed artery (8,9), especially in evaluating those stenoses with a noncircular lumen (10). When properly validated, crosssectional imaging might indeed replace the conventional gold standard to better characterize carotid plaque.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%