1991
DOI: 10.3109/01443619109027825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Cytology and Colposcopy in the Follow up of Laser Ablation for Cervical Intra-Epithelial Neoplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies that have attempted evaluation of post treatment follow up methods vary in their conclusions regarding the place of routine, as compared with selective, colposcopic review. Two studies recommended abandoning routine colposcopic assessment following laser vaporisation (Giles et al 1989; Lopes et al 1990), whilst two expressed reservations on the safety of this policy (Arena & Valentine 1991; Paraskevaides et al 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies that have attempted evaluation of post treatment follow up methods vary in their conclusions regarding the place of routine, as compared with selective, colposcopic review. Two studies recommended abandoning routine colposcopic assessment following laser vaporisation (Giles et al 1989; Lopes et al 1990), whilst two expressed reservations on the safety of this policy (Arena & Valentine 1991; Paraskevaides et al 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have attempted to determine the role of colposcopy, but the numbers studied have usually been too small to allow firm conclusions to be drawn as most described less than 30 recurrences 3–7 . The three studies with larger numbers of recurrences reported sensitivity rates for cytology of 60, 82 and 63% 8–10 . All three recommended the inclusion of colposcopy in follow up but gave no data on specificity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%