Evaluation of daily precipitation analyses in E‐OBS (v19.0e) and ERA5 by comparison to regional high‐resolution datasets in European regions

Abstract

Gridded analyses of observed precipitation are an important data resource for environmental modelling, climate model evaluation and climate monitoring.In Europe, datasets that resolve the rich mesoscale variations widely exist for the national territories, but similar datasets covering the entire continent are more recent. Here, we evaluate daily precipitation in two newly available pan-European datasets: E-OBS (v19.0e), a statistical analysis from rain-gauge data, and ERA5, the new global reanalysis from ECMWF. Special interest is on how the refinements of grid spacing, the methodological upgrades and the quantification of uncertainty (ensemble), bear on capabilities at the mesoscale.The evaluation is conducted in three subregions, the Alps, the Carpathians and Fennoscandia, and involves as reference high-quality regional datasets derived from dense rain-gauge data. The study suggests that E-OBS and ERA5 agree qualitatively well with the reference datasets. Major mesoscale patterns in the climatology (mean, wet-day frequency, 95% quantile) are reproduced.The improvement over earlier versions of the datasets is evident. ERA5 was found to overestimate mean precipitation in all regions, related to too many wet days. The accuracy of E-OBS was found to depend on station density, with spatial and temporal variations clearly less accurate in data sparse regions. In comparison, E-OBS turned out to be superior to ERA5 in regions with dense data, but the two datasets are on a par in regions with sparse data, and partly ERA5 has advantages. For both datasets we find that the spatial resolution is coarser than the grid spacing, with overly smooth fields and an underestimation of high quantiles. Also, both datasets were found to be clearly overconfident in their uncertainty characterization (too small ensemble spread).Overall, the two datasets advance the characterization of precipitation on a

Reliability of the ERA5 in Replicating Mean and Extreme Temperatures across Europe

“…From our analysis on the simulation of daily air temperature (T-2m) over Europe of the latest version of ERA datasets (ERA5), it is obvious that, in general, their performance is quite satisfactory, and they have been substantially improved in comparison to their previous versions. Analogous results were found in the recent study of Bandhauer et al [28], in which daily precipitation was evaluated over several parts of the European region. The authors mention, as their concluding remark, that even though ERA5 data are undoubtfully useful and can capture the mesoscale precipitation patterns over Northern and Central Europe, they present some limitations and weaknesses that should be taken under serious consideration.…”

Is there added value in the EURO‐CORDEX hindcast temperature simulations? Assessing the added value using climate distributions in Europe

“…According to Hofstra et al (2008) the smoothing occurs at the first stage of the interpolation and is mostly dependent on the station density and not on the interpolation methodology. Thus, even though the new E-OBS ensemble version proposes a gridded dataset with 0.1 of resolution, its nominal resolution is in fact lower, and an over-smoothing of the fields also occurs (Bandhauer et al, 2021). Since E-OBS v17 has a larger number of stations associated to each grid box than the individual ensemble members of E-OBS v23e, the first was chosen as ground truth.…”

Downscaling multi-model climate projection ensembles with deep learning (DeepESD): contribution to CORDEX EUR-44

“…E-OBS is a high-resolution observational dataset generated by spatially interpolating the European Climate Assessment & Dataset (ECA&D) network of stations (Klok and Klein Tank, 2009). Although national and sub-national datasets exist, E-OBS accurately represents the regional climate over the entire European continent (Bandhauer et al, 2022), and it is commonly used in continental-wide statistical downscaling experiments (Maraun et al, 2015;Vrac and Ayar, 2016;Baño-Medina et al, 2020. We chose version 20 (v20, release date October 2019) since it was the most recent at the start of this study.…”