2018
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dky376
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of dalbavancin alone and in combination with β-lactam antibiotics against resistant phenotypes of Staphylococcus aureus

Abstract: Dalbavancin was active against all MRSA strains tested, including heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus, daptomycin-non-susceptible and linezolid-resistant isolates. The synergy demonstrated against these organisms supports the use of dalbavancin in combination with β-lactams against resistant phenotypes of S. aureus. Further evaluation is warranted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, significant controversy exists regarding the current and future roles of vancomycin and teicoplanin in the treatment of serious hVISA-MRSA infections. Our data corroborate with what has been recently reported by other authors, reinforcing the hypothesis that dalbavancin may be a valuable agent against problematic pathogens [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. The interpretation of the slightly higher rate of dalbavancin non-susceptibility among RIF-R/hVISA isolates needs further investigations, although it is possible to assume that the presence of rpoB mutations in these strains [8], already associated with the emergence of vancomycin-intermediate resistance, may affect the antimicrobial activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, significant controversy exists regarding the current and future roles of vancomycin and teicoplanin in the treatment of serious hVISA-MRSA infections. Our data corroborate with what has been recently reported by other authors, reinforcing the hypothesis that dalbavancin may be a valuable agent against problematic pathogens [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. The interpretation of the slightly higher rate of dalbavancin non-susceptibility among RIF-R/hVISA isolates needs further investigations, although it is possible to assume that the presence of rpoB mutations in these strains [8], already associated with the emergence of vancomycin-intermediate resistance, may affect the antimicrobial activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Dalbavancin, a new second-generation semisynthetic lipoglycopeptide, active against Gram-positive pathogens, including MRSA, has recently been approved for the treatment of severe skin infections [4]. The analysis of the bactericidal activity by time-kill curve assays has shown that dalbavancin performs 4-8 times higher activity than vancomycin versus MRSA, and its activity, alone and in association, has also been tested against MRSA, VISA, hVISA and DNS isolates [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All MRSA are resistant to traditional beta-lactams, but when combined with glycopeptides, lipopeptides, or lipoglycopeptides, synergistic antimicrobial activity is commonly observed, especially among strains with reduced susceptibility to the latter antimicrobial classes ( Mehta et al, 2012 ; Werth et al, 2013b ; Xhemali et al, 2018 ). Some investigators have attributed this synergy to the “seesaw effect” ( Renzoni et al, 2017 ; Molina et al, 2020 ), a phenomenon where the susceptibility to beta-lactams increases with declining vancomycin or daptomycin susceptibility ( Sieradzki and Tomasz, 1997 ; Ortwine et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In CF patients, Staphylococcus aureus (and particularly MRSA) infection is the main challenge of antibiotic therapy, since the persistent infection caused by this bacterium is strongly associated with increased rates of decline in respiratory function and high mortality (Dolce et al, 2019). Thus, new approaches to fight this kind of bacterium are mandatory and should be based on new antimicrobials, most probably combined with conventional ones (Lo et al, 2018;Xhemali et al, 2019).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%