2021
DOI: 10.2147/opth.s346968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Decentration, Tilt and Angular Orientation of Toric Intraocular Lens

Abstract: Purpose The aim of this study was to develop software for the universal objective evaluation of factors influencing intraocular correction of astigmatism, such as decentration, tilt, axial position and angular orientation the toric intraocular lens (IOL). Patients and Methods Software was developed using the MS Visual Studio environment. The analysis was presented using images of 67 eyes with an implanted IOLs of the SN6ATx model series. Decentration and angular positio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Xiao et al 30 (AS OCT, corneal topographic axis) measured values of tilt 5.6° ± 1.6° and decentration 0.18 mm ± 0.12 mm similar to the values from AS OCT in our study. Other published results of IOL position (presented in the same format) are given relative to the pupillary axis or pupil center, and thus the comparison with our results is questionable: tilt 2.9° ± 0.9° and decentration 0.56 mm ± 0.31 mm (Wang et al 37 , AS OCT Visante, pupillary plane), tilt 3.7° ± 1.2° and decentration 0.21 mm ± 0.17 mm (Fus et al 38 , custom software, pupil center), tilt less than 2.4° and decentration less than 0.4 mm (de Castro et al 32 , Pentacam Scheimpflug imaging, pupillary axis), tilt 1.5° and decentration 0.21 mm (Rosales et al 31 , Pentacam Scheimpflug imaging, pupillary axis), tilt 4.4° ± 2.5° (T) and 9.20° ± 6.96° (S) and decentration 0.44 mm ± 0.19 mm (T) and 0.74 mm ± 0.91 mm (S) (Maedel et al 39 , Tabernero's (T) 17 and Schaeffel's (S) 19 Purkinje-meters, pupillary axis). All the mentioned IOL tilt values are smaller than those from our study (both AS OCT and dynamic Purkinje-meter), apart from the Schaeffel's Purkinje-meter values which are higher (9.2° ± 7.0°) and are given relative to the fixation axis as the only ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Xiao et al 30 (AS OCT, corneal topographic axis) measured values of tilt 5.6° ± 1.6° and decentration 0.18 mm ± 0.12 mm similar to the values from AS OCT in our study. Other published results of IOL position (presented in the same format) are given relative to the pupillary axis or pupil center, and thus the comparison with our results is questionable: tilt 2.9° ± 0.9° and decentration 0.56 mm ± 0.31 mm (Wang et al 37 , AS OCT Visante, pupillary plane), tilt 3.7° ± 1.2° and decentration 0.21 mm ± 0.17 mm (Fus et al 38 , custom software, pupil center), tilt less than 2.4° and decentration less than 0.4 mm (de Castro et al 32 , Pentacam Scheimpflug imaging, pupillary axis), tilt 1.5° and decentration 0.21 mm (Rosales et al 31 , Pentacam Scheimpflug imaging, pupillary axis), tilt 4.4° ± 2.5° (T) and 9.20° ± 6.96° (S) and decentration 0.44 mm ± 0.19 mm (T) and 0.74 mm ± 0.91 mm (S) (Maedel et al 39 , Tabernero's (T) 17 and Schaeffel's (S) 19 Purkinje-meters, pupillary axis). All the mentioned IOL tilt values are smaller than those from our study (both AS OCT and dynamic Purkinje-meter), apart from the Schaeffel's Purkinje-meter values which are higher (9.2° ± 7.0°) and are given relative to the fixation axis as the only ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…All the mentioned IOL tilt values are smaller than those from our study (both AS OCT and dynamic Purkinje-meter), apart from the Schaeffel's Purkinje-meter values which are higher (9.2° ± 7.0°) and are given relative to the fixation axis as the only ones. The values of IOL decentration vary considerably across the studies, even if the reference structure is limited to the pupil only -the range of mean values is from 0.17 mm to 0.74 mm [30][31][32][37][38][39] . We assume that different decentrations may depend primarily on different types of intraocular lenses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several factors contributing to IOL tilt and decentration[ 5 , 6 ]. Among those, the patients’ ocular condition is an important factor affecting IOL position.…”
Section: Causes Of Iol Tilt and Decentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advancements in imaging technologies, such as swept-source optical coherence tomography ( S S-OCT) and 3D OCT image reconstruction, have enabled more accurate assessment and automated quantification of IOL tilt and decentration [ 6 , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] ]. This facilitates a comprehensive understanding of the spatial relationship between the IOL and the capsular bag, consequently facilitating a deeper exploration of the effects of postoperative decentration and tilt on visual acuity, dysphotopsia, and wavefront aberrations [ [16] , [17] , [18] ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%