“…Xiao et al 30 (AS OCT, corneal topographic axis) measured values of tilt 5.6° ± 1.6° and decentration 0.18 mm ± 0.12 mm similar to the values from AS OCT in our study. Other published results of IOL position (presented in the same format) are given relative to the pupillary axis or pupil center, and thus the comparison with our results is questionable: tilt 2.9° ± 0.9° and decentration 0.56 mm ± 0.31 mm (Wang et al 37 , AS OCT Visante, pupillary plane), tilt 3.7° ± 1.2° and decentration 0.21 mm ± 0.17 mm (Fus et al 38 , custom software, pupil center), tilt less than 2.4° and decentration less than 0.4 mm (de Castro et al 32 , Pentacam Scheimpflug imaging, pupillary axis), tilt 1.5° and decentration 0.21 mm (Rosales et al 31 , Pentacam Scheimpflug imaging, pupillary axis), tilt 4.4° ± 2.5° (T) and 9.20° ± 6.96° (S) and decentration 0.44 mm ± 0.19 mm (T) and 0.74 mm ± 0.91 mm (S) (Maedel et al 39 , Tabernero's (T) 17 and Schaeffel's (S) 19 Purkinje-meters, pupillary axis). All the mentioned IOL tilt values are smaller than those from our study (both AS OCT and dynamic Purkinje-meter), apart from the Schaeffel's Purkinje-meter values which are higher (9.2° ± 7.0°) and are given relative to the fixation axis as the only ones.…”