2017
DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.202197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of decision-to-delivery interval in emergency cesarean section: A 1-year prospective audit in a tertiary care hospital

Abstract: Background and Aims:The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) committee on professional standards and the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines suggest that decision-to-delivery interval (DDI) and emergency cesarean section (CS) should not be more than 30 min, and a delay of more than75 min in the presence of maternal or fetal compromise can lead to poor outcome. This prospective 1-year study was conducted on emergency CS in a tertiary care hospital to evaluate the DD… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

6
30
1
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
30
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The current study showed that only 19.6% of women who underwent category-1 emergency C/S were delivered within the recommended DDI of 30 min. The mean ± SD of DDI was 42 ± 21.4 min which is similar with a study done by Sunanda et al in which the mean ± SD was 36.3 ± 17 min [21]. The difference might be due to sample size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The current study showed that only 19.6% of women who underwent category-1 emergency C/S were delivered within the recommended DDI of 30 min. The mean ± SD of DDI was 42 ± 21.4 min which is similar with a study done by Sunanda et al in which the mean ± SD was 36.3 ± 17 min [21]. The difference might be due to sample size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A developing country-based evidence showed that financial constraints have been cited as a reason to refusal to CS delivery [37]. We found better CS service uptake among educated women than non-educated women as confirmed in prior studies (34, 37. In Africa, by prospecting vaginal delivery will occur, poor birth outcome finally happened even with CS performed [39], because of delay in getting CS delivery timely [40]. The possible mechanism through which higher level of education increases the odd of CS delivery could be that, more educated women are likely to develop decision making power, which in turn, may rise the chance that women could get CS service [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13]16 This proportion is much lower than that found in developing countries of between 55 to 65 percent. 2,7 Some authors have shown that emergency caesarean sections were associated with higher risks for maternal and infant morbidity while others give contrary results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%