2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-23105-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of deep learning and transform domain feature extraction techniques for land cover classification: balancing through augmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To experiment with the features generated by the model feature fusion, they used a dataset for their experiments. The experimental results proved its effectiveness (Parikh et al, 2023). Klonecki et al (2023) argued that most vehicle driving methods do not take into account the cost information associated with features, for which they design a cost-constrained feature selection problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To experiment with the features generated by the model feature fusion, they used a dataset for their experiments. The experimental results proved its effectiveness (Parikh et al, 2023). Klonecki et al (2023) argued that most vehicle driving methods do not take into account the cost information associated with features, for which they design a cost-constrained feature selection problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The experimental results indicated that the location estimation accuracy followed the resolution of the implementation of the method (Ludwig-Barbosa et al, 2023). Parikh et al (2023) argued that temporal features in vehicle signals are affected by a variety of complex factors, and that identifying features that improve classification accuracy is a major problem in vehicle operation research. They compared transform domain feature extraction for different state classifications and evaluated its feature generation capability using a convolutional autoencoder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%