2023
DOI: 10.1643/h2023018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Deep Learning-Based Monitoring of Frog Reproductive Phenology

Kaede Kimura,
Teiji Sota

Abstract: To evaluate the utility of a deep-learning approach for monitoring amphibian reproduction, we examined the classification accuracy of a trained model and tested correlations between calling intensity and frog abundance. Field recording and count surveys were conducted at two sites in Kyoto City, Japan. A convolutional neural network (CNN) model was trained to classify the calls of five anuran species. The model achieved 91-100% precision and 75-98% recall per species, with relatively lower performance on less … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We applied the trained model to the entire recordings collected on Ishigaki Island (sites 1-3) to infer the breeding phenology of P. leucomystax and R. marina. Reproductive activity was quantified by counting the number of detections (Kimura and Sota 2023). Give that each recording was 15 minutes in length and the BirdNET analysis unit was 3 seconds, the number of detections per recording ranged from 0 (no detection) to 300 (continuous detections throughout the recording).…”
Section: Breeding Phenologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied the trained model to the entire recordings collected on Ishigaki Island (sites 1-3) to infer the breeding phenology of P. leucomystax and R. marina. Reproductive activity was quantified by counting the number of detections (Kimura and Sota 2023). Give that each recording was 15 minutes in length and the BirdNET analysis unit was 3 seconds, the number of detections per recording ranged from 0 (no detection) to 300 (continuous detections throughout the recording).…”
Section: Breeding Phenologymentioning
confidence: 99%