2018
DOI: 10.5272/jimab.2018242.2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of deformation and fracture of three single-file NiTi rotary instruments: ProTaper F2, WaveOne Primary and OneShape in simulated curved canals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…30 A study by Hamid et al 77 in a student clinic setting found NiTi reciprocating instruments to be superior to hybrid hand/NiTi rotary instruments in the reduction of treatment time, procedural errors and fracture incidence and the improvement of obturation length and taper. Shenouda et al 85 evaluated the fracture resistance of WaveOne Primary, ProTaper Universal F2 and One Shape files. The results show the One Shape file to possess a significantly greater fracture resistance than the WaveOne Primary and ProTaper Universal F2 files.…”
Section: Continuous Rotary Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 A study by Hamid et al 77 in a student clinic setting found NiTi reciprocating instruments to be superior to hybrid hand/NiTi rotary instruments in the reduction of treatment time, procedural errors and fracture incidence and the improvement of obturation length and taper. Shenouda et al 85 evaluated the fracture resistance of WaveOne Primary, ProTaper Universal F2 and One Shape files. The results show the One Shape file to possess a significantly greater fracture resistance than the WaveOne Primary and ProTaper Universal F2 files.…”
Section: Continuous Rotary Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%