2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Dengue Model Performances Developed Using Artificial Neural Network and Random Forest Classifiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prediction results of random forest classification and ordinary kriging are good enough to display in the form of a map. The random forest classification prediction model developed in this study has better performance than studies [8], [9], [10], and [11]. This is because the random forest model developed in this study applies feature expansion based on several previous years and obtained an accuracy value of 97% in model testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The prediction results of random forest classification and ordinary kriging are good enough to display in the form of a map. The random forest classification prediction model developed in this study has better performance than studies [8], [9], [10], and [11]. This is because the random forest model developed in this study applies feature expansion based on several previous years and obtained an accuracy value of 97% in model testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The decision tree was chosen randomly from the training data, then combined using the Breiman bagging method. After that, majority voting is carried out based on the decision tree to get predictive results [11].…”
Section: Random Forestmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations