The SAGE Handbook of Evaluation 2006
DOI: 10.4135/9781848608078.n24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Development Interventions and Humanitarian Action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The difficulties and particular features of the operating environment in Gaza (i.e. nature of conflict; security) are important constraints that limit the validity of the findings and recommendations (Feinstein and Beck, 2006). The organizational culture in the humanitarian sector in Gaza, which is strictly related to the nature of this prolonged and recurrent conflict, for us represents one of the main limitations.…”
Section: Conclusion and Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulties and particular features of the operating environment in Gaza (i.e. nature of conflict; security) are important constraints that limit the validity of the findings and recommendations (Feinstein and Beck, 2006). The organizational culture in the humanitarian sector in Gaza, which is strictly related to the nature of this prolonged and recurrent conflict, for us represents one of the main limitations.…”
Section: Conclusion and Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embedded evaluation-based approaches are where the evaluators are involved in the ongoing review and modification of an intervention as part of an iterative process. Such approaches have been used in aid programmes (Feinstein & Beck, 2013). For example, the work of the United Kingdom government's Department for International Development includes the use of embedded evaluation (DFID, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This stems from the fact that "Policymakers are not only interested in 'evidence-based policy', but also wish to judge the effectiveness of specific interventions" (Befani, Ramalingam, & Stern, 2015, p. 1). The developmental evaluations usually follow the OECD DAC criteria -relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability (Andersen, 2014;Feinstein & Beck, 2007;Picciotto, 2014). Presently there is a renewed emphasis on measurement and certain evaluation methods, particularly experimental or quasi-experimental methods.…”
Section: Methodology and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%