2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.endoen.2014.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of diabetic foot screening in Primary Care

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
3
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
14
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Through physical examination, a statistically significant association was observed between the risk level for the development of DFU and the following variables: appearance of the nails, humidity, and feet deformities. Alonso-Fernández et al [25] had also described such association ( p < 0.01) between the identification of feet deformities and DFU.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Through physical examination, a statistically significant association was observed between the risk level for the development of DFU and the following variables: appearance of the nails, humidity, and feet deformities. Alonso-Fernández et al [25] had also described such association ( p < 0.01) between the identification of feet deformities and DFU.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Um importante fator de risco para o pé diabético é o tabaco, pois sua presença aumenta a ocorrência de alterações macrovasculares que podem aumentar o surgimento de úlceras, como também compromete seu prognóstico quando estas já estão presentes, propiciando o aparecimento de complicações como infecção, gangrena e até amputação (26,29,30) . Destaca-se no presente estudo a associação significativa do uso do tabaco com o risco para ulceração, embora, dos 88 indivíduos em risco para úlceras, 50,0% da população referiu não fazer uso do fumo e 36,4% referiram ser ex-fumantes em um período maior que seis meses.…”
Section: Classificação De Risco Para Ulceraçãounclassified
“…previous study conducted at 17 health care centers nonrandomly distributed in 11 Spanish autonomous communities at 87% vs. 56% respectively [8] . In contrast, the rate of using special tools in the current study was far lower at 12% compared to 39.5% for monofilament examination, 45.8% for distal pulse examination, and 10.1% for ABI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%