2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.irbm.2022.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Diagnostic Value of Mediastinum for Differentiation of Drug Sensitive, Multi and Extensively Drug Resistant Tuberculosis Using Chest X-Rays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When classifying between DS-TB and DR-TB, we can conclude that the suggested method is 30.01% more accurate than the alternative methods. Comparing the classification results of DR-TB and MDR-TB between the proposed approaches of Jaeger et al [ 24 ] and Tulo et al [ 12 ], utilizing all KPIs, the proposed method provides a superior answer by 2.52–46.27% (using the information provided in Table 9 ). The classification results of DR-TB and XDR-TB utilizing the data presented in Table 10 demonstrated that the proposed approach is 1.71–5.52% superior to the method of Tulo et al [ 12 ].…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…When classifying between DS-TB and DR-TB, we can conclude that the suggested method is 30.01% more accurate than the alternative methods. Comparing the classification results of DR-TB and MDR-TB between the proposed approaches of Jaeger et al [ 24 ] and Tulo et al [ 12 ], utilizing all KPIs, the proposed method provides a superior answer by 2.52–46.27% (using the information provided in Table 9 ). The classification results of DR-TB and XDR-TB utilizing the data presented in Table 10 demonstrated that the proposed approach is 1.71–5.52% superior to the method of Tulo et al [ 12 ].…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing the classification results of DR-TB and MDR-TB between the proposed approaches of Jaeger et al [ 24 ] and Tulo et al [ 12 ], utilizing all KPIs, the proposed method provides a superior answer by 2.52–46.27% (using the information provided in Table 9 ). The classification results of DR-TB and XDR-TB utilizing the data presented in Table 10 demonstrated that the proposed approach is 1.71–5.52% superior to the method of Tulo et al [ 12 ]. Finally, Table 11 reveals that the proposed approaches produce solutions that are 2.43% to 6.67% more accurate than the method of Tulo et al…”
Section: Computational Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations