2019
DOI: 10.4209/aaqr.2018.12.0450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Different Machine Learning Approaches to Forecasting PM2.5 Mass Concentrations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After cleaning and pre-processing the data, it is subjected to further analysis including time-series analysis and analyzing the overall impact of every feature on the PM2.5 value [ 43 ].…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After cleaning and pre-processing the data, it is subjected to further analysis including time-series analysis and analyzing the overall impact of every feature on the PM2.5 value [ 43 ].…”
Section: Data Acquisition and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction results of neural networks are better than that of linear model, and the maximum prediction error 21 hours ahead is 32% (Perez and Menares, 2018). The long short-term memory (LSTM) can effectively forecast air pollution and achieve the best results (Karimian et al, 2019). The prediction of the 2016 ozone season using generalized additive models are in good agreement with the relevant measurement results (R 2 = 0.70) (Pernak et al, 2019).…”
Section: Comparison With Other Modelsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…High levels of airborne particles also present a significant health risk, and their effects on human health are well-documented in the The combination of ground-level concentrations and satellite retrievals into a robust model is not a straightforward task, but machine learning techniques have proven to be a valuable tool in this task. The use of machine learning techniques, including artificial neural networks (ANNs), for air quality applications has been explored for some time [24], and its feasibility has been demonstrated [25]. A neural network uses artificial neurons, which are the smallest units in data processing [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The types of ANN include the back-propagation neural network (BPNN) [27,28], multilayer perceptron (MLP) [29,30], radial basis function (RBF) [31,32], and adopted neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS) [33][34][35]. While most of the available work is aimed at long-term forecasting of criteria pollutants using meteorological variables and source emissions as predictors [36], the use of satellite-derived aerosol optical depth (AOD) variables or reanalysis data for training and testing ANNs is also being investigated with favorable results [25]. Still, the majority of satellite applications have not been tested in developing countries, typically having higher PM 2.5 levels and distinctive emission source profiles [36,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%