2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of different methods for assessing bioavailability of DDT residues during soil remediation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis of tissue samples followed a method described in previous studies, 21,22 and the details are given in the Supporting Information. The BSAF, i.e., the ratio of the concentration in the worm (normalized over lipid content) to the concentration in soil or sediment (normalized over organic carbon content), was calculated as the bioavailability end point for native (BSAF) and labeled (BSAF*) POPs:…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analysis of tissue samples followed a method described in previous studies, 21,22 and the details are given in the Supporting Information. The BSAF, i.e., the ratio of the concentration in the worm (normalized over lipid content) to the concentration in soil or sediment (normalized over organic carbon content), was calculated as the bioavailability end point for native (BSAF) and labeled (BSAF*) POPs:…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is still used in some countries to control malaria vectors (2,4). However, notwithstanding the general prohibition in use, its residues are still consistently found in soil, food, human, and animal samples (5)(6)(7)(8)(9). DDT is classified as a persistent organic pollutant (POP) because of its high stability in the environment, which makes it a lasting source of ecosystem contamination (10)(11)(12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MPs affect the biophysical properties (damages soil structure, reduces aeration and water permeability and water holding capacity) of soil 17,127,128 because of the decreasing absorption capacity of freely available chemicals in soil-water due to hydrophobicity of MPs 129 . Figure 5 shows an overview of atmospheric deposition of MPs in the terrestrial ecosystem and their effects on soil properties and feedbacks to the atmosphere 130 .…”
Section: Terrestrial Ecosystemmentioning
confidence: 99%