2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Different Monitoring Techniques During Damage Infliction on Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The only bridge damage detection techniques that authors could find are proposed in [51,52]. In one of only two studies found, Alten et al [51] conducted a progressive damage case study on an aging bridge to evaluate different bridge condition assessment techniques. Further analyses are carried to investigate how sensor location affects its sensitivity to damage.…”
Section: Overview Of Bridge Damage Detection Methods Using Direct Rotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only bridge damage detection techniques that authors could find are proposed in [51,52]. In one of only two studies found, Alten et al [51] conducted a progressive damage case study on an aging bridge to evaluate different bridge condition assessment techniques. Further analyses are carried to investigate how sensor location affects its sensitivity to damage.…”
Section: Overview Of Bridge Damage Detection Methods Using Direct Rotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…damage. Recent studies have developed various rotation-based damage detection techniques for bridge monitoring systems, including visionbased methods and measurement data from inertial sensors [20][21][22][23]. Damage detection techniques are still relatively unproven for monitoring of bridges during scour events and also require an undamaged model of the bridge.…”
Section: Rotation-based Structural Health Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inclinometers have also been used to calculate the deformed shape of bridge deck structures (Burdet & Zanella, 2000;He, Yang, & Zhao, 2014;Helmi, Taylor, Zarafshan, & Ansari, 2015;Hou, Yang, & Huang, 2005;LLoret, Inaudi, & Vurpillot, 1998;O'Leary & Harker, 2012;Perregaux, Vurpillot, Inaudi, & Burdet, 1998;Robert-Nicoud, Raphael, Burdet, & Smith, 2005;Sousa, Cavadas, Henriques, Bento, & Figueiras, 2013;Vurpillot, Krueger, Benouaich, Clément, & Inaudi, 1998), the advantage being that unlike any other direct methods of measuring bridge deflections, inclinometers do not require a reference point. Alten, Ralbovsky, Vorwagner, Toplitzer, and Wittmann (2017) evaluated different monitoring techniques through a progressive damage case study conducted on a posttensioned reinforced concrete bridge over a 12 week period. The test bridge was instrumented with 23 sensors: 6 accelerometers, 2 biaxial inclinometers (at support locations) and 15 fibre-optic strain gauges.…”
Section: Rotation Measurement In Bridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%