2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10499-004-3099-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of different protein sources in fingerling grey mullet Mugil cephalus practical diets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, studies with different fish species have shown no or only minor effects of replacing fishmeal by different yeast products on whole body or muscle proximate composition . Carcass composition was not significantly affected by protein source when C. utilis replaced fishmeal in diets for rainbow trout, or fishmeal and blood meal in diets for fingerling grey mullet ( Mugil cephalus ) . Nor were there any clear effects on carcass composition when using high levels of C. utilis in diets for tilapia ( Oreochromis mossambicus Peters) …”
Section: Effect Of Dietary Yeast On Growth Performance Nitrogen Utilmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, studies with different fish species have shown no or only minor effects of replacing fishmeal by different yeast products on whole body or muscle proximate composition . Carcass composition was not significantly affected by protein source when C. utilis replaced fishmeal in diets for rainbow trout, or fishmeal and blood meal in diets for fingerling grey mullet ( Mugil cephalus ) . Nor were there any clear effects on carcass composition when using high levels of C. utilis in diets for tilapia ( Oreochromis mossambicus Peters) …”
Section: Effect Of Dietary Yeast On Growth Performance Nitrogen Utilmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Research on the use of single‐cell protein is started before two decades in fish feed (Dabrowski, Hassard, Quinn, Pitcher, & Flinn, ). Luzzana et al (), and Lunger, Craig, and Mclean () could replace 15% and 25% dietary fishmeal using single‐cell protein in Rachycentron canadum and Mugil cephalus , respectively, and the replacement level was increased to 40% in Oreochromis mossambicus (Davies & Wareham, ) and to 50% in Sciaenops ocellatus (Rosalesa, Castilloa, Pohlenz, & Gatlin, ). The level of replacement was in the range of 45%–60% in P. vannamei when yeast‐based single‐cell protein used as a fishmeal substitute (Gamboa‐Delgado, Fernández‐Diaz, Nieto‐Lopez, & Cruz‐Suarez, ; Zhao et al, ).…”
Section: Alternative To Fishmealmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mullets demonstrate omnivorous, opportunistic feeding behaviour (water filtering or benthophagous) with a large variety of food items, such as plants, detrital matter, microalgae, benthic meiofauna, and small macrofauna, being part of their diet (Lebreton et al, 2011) but very little information is available regarding growth performance and feed utilization of mullets fed formulated compound diets. Research has focused mainly on Mugil cephalus (Papaparaskeva-Papoutsoglou and Alexis, 1986;Argyropoulou et al, 1992;Luzzana et al, 2005) although other mullet species have also attracted researchers' interest (Ojaveer et al, 1996;El-Sayed and El-Ghobashy, 2011). Knowledge regarding the growth performance of farmed L. aurata is limited (Chervinski 1975;1976).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%