Evaluation of different radon guideline values based on characterization of ecological risk and visualization of lung cancer mortality trends in British Columbia, Canada

Abstract

BackgroundThere is no safe concentration of radon gas, but guideline values provide threshold concentrations that are used to map areas at higher risk. These values vary between different regions, countries, and organizations, which can lead to differential classification of risk. For example the World Health Organization suggests a 100 Bq m−3value, while Health Canada recommends 200 Bq m−3. Our objective was to describe how different thresholds characterized ecological radon risk and their visual association with lung cancer mortality trends in British Columbia, Canada.MethodsEight threshold values between 50 and 600 Bq m−3 were identified, and classes of radon vulnerability were defined based on whether the observed 95th percentile radon concentration was above or below each value. A balanced random forest algorithm was used to model vulnerability, and the results were mapped. We compared high vulnerability areas, their estimated populations, and differences in lung cancer mortality trends stratified by smoking prevalence and sex.ResultsClassification accuracy improved as the threshold concentrations decreased and the area classified as high vulnerability increased. Majority of the population lived within areas of lower vulnerability regardless of the threshold value. Thresholds as low as 50 Bq m−3 were associated with higher lung cancer mortality, even in areas with low smoking prevalence. Temporal trends in lung cancer mortality were increasing for women, while decreasing for men.ConclusionsRadon contributes to lung cancer in British Columbia. The results of the study contribute evidence supporting the use of a reference level lower than the current guideline of 200 Bq m−3 for the province.

Radon in Schools: A Brief Review of State Laws and Regulations in the United States

“…The improvements in data collection and availability will be valuable for future campaigns and for determining where collaborative efforts are most needed [ 35 ]. Measuring and mitigating radon at schools should be based on ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable), the precautionary principle to minimize radiation doses and releases of radioactive materials with using practical, cost-effective measures [ 4 , 36 , 37 ]. Therefore, we recommend that a federally mandated maximum radon limit be established for schools and other buildings with public access, as should guidelines regarding the timeframe for initial testing and the frequency of re-testing for radon.…”

An Interdisciplinary Population Health Approach to Radon Health Risk Management in Canada

“…Men being more aware of the risks of radon exposure, will test houses more often but are less concerned and less affected compared to women (Poortinga, 2008(Poortinga, , 2011. Temporal trends in lung cancer mortality are increasing for women while decreasing for men (Branion-Calles et al, 2015). However, it is not yet clear whether this is due to the increasing rates of smoking among women or due to their spending more time indoors.…”

Occupational exposure monitoring for radon in various manufacturing workplaces and underground public-use facilities in Korea

“…12 Several studies, including exposure assessment, risk assessment, and epidemiological studies, have reported that radon exposure has a signicantly positive association with an increased incidence and mortality of lung cancer. [13][14][15][16][17] However, some recent studies showed that the risk of lung cancer could be signicantly elevated by not only radon but also other nonoccupational factors. Two studies reported the possibility of a joint effect of smoking and radon exposure, [18][19][20] and another study also demonstrated that the risk of lung cancer mortality was signicantly associated with nonoccupational factors, including nationality, region, education, and smoking history, rather than radon exposure.…”