2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2020.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of diffusion measurements reveals radial diffusivity indicative of microstructural damage following acute, mild traumatic brain injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we did not investigate whether other DTI metrics, including radial diffusivity (RD) and axial diffusivity (AD) were associated with higher classification rates compared to FA. RD and AD have been shown to relate to TBI ( Khong et al, 2016 ; Mahan et al, 2021 ); however, FA was included as the primary DTI metric in the current study, to see whether similar classification rates were observed as our previous study classifying individuals with and without acute TBI recruited from the general community ( Vergara et al, 2017 ). Additionally, we only investigated whether diffusion MRI metrics could reliably classify between participants with and without self-reported history of chronic TBI in incarcerated men, not incarcerated women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Second, we did not investigate whether other DTI metrics, including radial diffusivity (RD) and axial diffusivity (AD) were associated with higher classification rates compared to FA. RD and AD have been shown to relate to TBI ( Khong et al, 2016 ; Mahan et al, 2021 ); however, FA was included as the primary DTI metric in the current study, to see whether similar classification rates were observed as our previous study classifying individuals with and without acute TBI recruited from the general community ( Vergara et al, 2017 ). Additionally, we only investigated whether diffusion MRI metrics could reliably classify between participants with and without self-reported history of chronic TBI in incarcerated men, not incarcerated women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Further development of these algorithms could potentially reduce implicit biases in the management of brain injury and improve outcomes for all patients, although great care must be taken to make sure that the algorithms are themselves not biased. Examples of assessors to include in these prognosticating algorithms include measures of brainstem function such as pupillometry, eye tracking or other quantitative cranial nerve function ( 30 33 ), serum markers ( 26 ), and image analysis ( 36 – 39 ). These are measures that should potentially be able to be confirmed as “colorblind.” Volitional assessments that rely on physician bias, level of patient education, cooperation, absence of cultural dissonance and language skills will likely contribute to inequity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utilization of objective measures with machine learning (artificial intelligence) has the potential to reduce inequities in the neurosurgical field through automation, improved accuracy, speed, accessibility, and reduced costs ( 34 36 ). A major caveat is that we need to ensure that data elements incorporated into future algorithms do not perpetuate inequity ( 40 – 42 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examples of such parameters include the mean, axial, and radial diffusivity (MD, AD, and RD, respectively) and the fractional anisotropy (FA). Changes in these parameters have been detected in numerous conditions, including aging ( 1 ), traumatic brain injury (TBI) ( 2 , 3 ), schizophrenia ( 4 , 5 ), Parkinson's disease ( 6 , 7 ), multiple sclerosis (MS) ( 8 ), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) ( 9 12 ), ( 13 15 ). Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) is an extension to DTI that provides information complementary to DTI ( 16 18 ), but requires a more comprehensive acquisition protocol and, thus, longer scan times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%