2019 IEEE 17th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics (SISY) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/sisy47553.2019.9111567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Digitalized Handwriting for Dysgraphia Detection Using Random Forest Classification Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, irregularities in writing should not be filtered, but instead interpreted as they are relevant for detecting children with dysgraphia. The classification performances presented are a little bit below the ones given in some recent papers [3,34], but close or better than some others [16,[35][36][37], and they are presented in TABLE 6. The results in these papers are good and very interesting but each of these articles has a limitation that seems to make it unfit to be extended for a large-scale dysgraphia pre-diagnosis.…”
Section: Comments On the Feature Selected For The Final Modelsupporting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, irregularities in writing should not be filtered, but instead interpreted as they are relevant for detecting children with dysgraphia. The classification performances presented are a little bit below the ones given in some recent papers [3,34], but close or better than some others [16,[35][36][37], and they are presented in TABLE 6. The results in these papers are good and very interesting but each of these articles has a limitation that seems to make it unfit to be extended for a large-scale dysgraphia pre-diagnosis.…”
Section: Comments On the Feature Selected For The Final Modelsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…On the contrary, we have included children with dysgraphia from schools, improving generalizability of the model if used on populations not from medical centers. On the other hand, [16,35,36] only focus on a small number of children (91 and 78), which can be an issue especially when the data have high dimensions. Moreover [16] and [35] use writing on a tablet device (Android), which is known to affect movement control and execution [10][11][12].…”
Section: Comments On the Feature Selected For The Final Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DYS/TD Repartition Model Used Score [11] 27/27 Random Forest 96.43% [12] 56/242 Random Forest 97.9% [13] 48/43 SVM (RBF Kernel) 82.51% [16] 24/971 RNN 90% 1 [13] 42/36 Random Forest 67% [14] 42/36 SVM 66% [14] 42/36 AdaBoost 64% [15] 57/63 Random Forest 77.6% 2 [15] 57/63 SVM 78.8% 2 [15] 57/63 AdaBoost 79.5% 2 [20] 122/458 SVM (RBF Kernel) 83%…”
Section: Referencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because we have a labeled database, we worked with supervised machine learning algorithms for our study. Several classes of algorithms have been used in the literature [11][12][13][14][15][16]40], therefore 9 models were tested, with different sets of hyperparameters, to select the best ones for each model.…”
Section: Preprocessing Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation