2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2009.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of dosimetric functions for Ir-192 source using radiochromic film

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of studies have evaluated different detector types for the dosimetry of low energy photon beams (Fletcher and Mills, 2008;Guillerminet et al, 2005;Healy et al, 2005;Hill et al, 2008;Hugtenburg et al, 2001;Jurado et al, 2005;Li et al, 1997;Ma et al, 1998;Nelson et al, 2008;Prestwich and Murphy, 2000;Rink et al, 2007;Sellakumar et al, 2009). There are limited recommendations by which a new detector should be tested in order that it can replace a gold standard detector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have evaluated different detector types for the dosimetry of low energy photon beams (Fletcher and Mills, 2008;Guillerminet et al, 2005;Healy et al, 2005;Hill et al, 2008;Hugtenburg et al, 2001;Jurado et al, 2005;Li et al, 1997;Ma et al, 1998;Nelson et al, 2008;Prestwich and Murphy, 2000;Rink et al, 2007;Sellakumar et al, 2009). There are limited recommendations by which a new detector should be tested in order that it can replace a gold standard detector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would put the point at approximately 5.7 mm from the tip of the source (the source is 3.6 mm long)-which is a point often lying on the tip of a treatment applicator. The dose profile along the axis of the source is related to the anisotropy function and has been previously documented that the anisotropy function is at its weakest in the direction along the plane of the source [14,17,22]. Due to this, and since the difference from published results is only slightly above 2% (i.e.…”
Section: Source Configuration Data Checkmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Each site had non-optimized and IPSA optimized plans created. The PTV was used as the CTV used in the COIN formula [21,22]. The reference isodose was the 100% isodose line Comparison of DVH graphs showed a close correlation between Plato and Oncentra planning systems, with shape and relative curve values consistent from one system to the next.…”
Section: Geometrical Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of unanimous results, which would support definitely the statistical insignificance of the dependence of radiochromic film's reaction to radiation energy (especially lower than 500 kV), convinced us to use iridium source for film calibration. Homogenous irradiation of a piece of film detector with a point source in one position [ 31 ] is not achievable, therefore, a special arrangement of irradiation based on Khushdeep Singh's [ 21 ] work with two catheters was used. That allowed to deposit not less than 95% with standard deviation of 0.82% of reference dose on a defined film area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%