2010
DOI: 10.3310/hta14460-02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of droplet dispersion during non-invasive ventilation, oxygen therapy, nebuliser treatment and chest physiotherapy in clinical practice: implications for management of pandemic influenza and other airborne infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
177
0
28

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 226 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
177
0
28
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the Toronto experience with SARS, 76 in which some clinicians contracted SARS during intubation of patients who failed NIV, the use of NIV was discouraged because of infection risk, but this was recently challenged by Simonds et al, 77 who found that the droplets generated during NIV are Ͼ 10 m, so that they are not likely to remain airborne.…”
Section: Risky Business Pandemic Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the Toronto experience with SARS, 76 in which some clinicians contracted SARS during intubation of patients who failed NIV, the use of NIV was discouraged because of infection risk, but this was recently challenged by Simonds et al, 77 who found that the droplets generated during NIV are Ͼ 10 m, so that they are not likely to remain airborne.…”
Section: Risky Business Pandemic Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study showed that NIV and chest physiotherapy are dropletgenerating procedures, producing droplets of .10 mm in size. Due to their large mass, most fall out on to local surfaces within 1 m. These findings confirm that healthcare workers providing NIV and chest physiotherapy, and working within 1 m of an infected patient should have a higher level of respiratory protection, but that infection control measures designed to limit aerosol spread may have less relevance for these procedures [86]. The World Health Organization (WHO) has included NIV among aerosol-generating procedures in which the risk of pathogen transmission is possible [87].…”
Section: Pandemicsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The amount of droplets falls significantly at a distance .1 m from the patient [39,40], but healthcare workers who apply NIV have to stand close to the patient and, therefore, can be exposed to potentially infectious droplets. The decision whether or not NIV can be used in these situations, as well as the general precautions to reduce disease transmission, usually depends on local infection policies.…”
Section: Droplet Generation and Airborne Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision whether or not NIV can be used in these situations, as well as the general precautions to reduce disease transmission, usually depends on local infection policies. However, if NIV is applied, a nonvented facial mask and filtered exhalate can reduce environmental spread [39]. Also, fitting and securing the mask before the ventilator is turned on and similarly turning off the ventilator before the mask is removed or lifted away from the face is usually recommended.…”
Section: Droplet Generation and Airborne Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%