2012
DOI: 10.1590/s2176-94512012000200020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of dry needling and 0.5% lidocaine injection therapies in myofascial pain trigger points in masticatory muscles

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of trigger points injections using lidocaine 0.5% and dry needling without any kind of home-based rehabilitation program. METHODS: Sixteen patients with myofascial pain and trigger points in masticatory muscles were randomly assigned to two groups and received only one application session. The pressure pain threshold (PPT) was recorded before and after the injection: Ten minutes, 24 hours later, 7, 15, 21 and 30 days after the treatment. Vis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Justificou-se, em uma pesquisa, que o agulhamento seco é tão eficaz como a injeção de uma solução anestésica, como a lidocaína, visto que ambos foram capazes de interromper os mecanismos do PGM e aliviar os sintomas de dor miofascial 27 . Em concordância com outro estudo randomizado, comparou-se o uso de agulhamento seco versus injeção de lidocaína na intervenção de PGM, que mostrou que ambos são eficazes na inativação deles, porém sugeriu-se que o agulhamento seco pode ser preferido aos anestésicos locais, devido a menos efeitos colaterais 25 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Justificou-se, em uma pesquisa, que o agulhamento seco é tão eficaz como a injeção de uma solução anestésica, como a lidocaína, visto que ambos foram capazes de interromper os mecanismos do PGM e aliviar os sintomas de dor miofascial 27 . Em concordância com outro estudo randomizado, comparou-se o uso de agulhamento seco versus injeção de lidocaína na intervenção de PGM, que mostrou que ambos são eficazes na inativação deles, porém sugeriu-se que o agulhamento seco pode ser preferido aos anestésicos locais, devido a menos efeitos colaterais 25 .…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Foram avaliados os níveis de dor pela EAV, limiar de dor p. 111 à pressão e palpação de PGM. Concluiu-se que ambos os grupos tiveram redução estatisticamente significativa, de acordo com a EAV, e foram capazes de interromper os mecanismo dos PGM e aliviar os sintomas da dor miofascial 27 .…”
Section: P 110unclassified
“…Study designs for RCTs included in the analysis were as follows: comparisons of acupuncture with an inactive control (n = 16), [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] comparison of acupuncture with a conventionally used active control (n = 19), [50,[52][53][54][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70] and comparison of effects of an active control with the same treatment plus acupuncture use as an add-on treatment (n = 4). [65,66,71,72] Among these, 5 articles contained both inactive and active controls, [50,[52][53][54]56] and 2 articles used both active controls and add-on treatments with active controls [65,66] (Supplementary Tables 2-4, http://links.lww.com/ MD/J...…”
Section: Study Analysis 321 Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inactive controls used included the following: sham acupuncture, [41][42][43][45][46][47]49,50,55] sham laser acupuncture, [44,48,56] sham DN, [51,53] and no treatment (wait-list) [52,54] (Supplementary Table 2, http://links.lww.com/MD/J688). Traditional active controls identified were as follows: physical therapy including ultrasound and ultrashort-wave therapy, [50,[58][59][60][61][62] laser therapy, [56] drug therapy, [57,64,65,67] injection therapy, [53,63,[66][67][68] and the use of a splint [52,54,69,70] (Supplementary Table 3, http://links.lww. com/MD/J689).…”
Section: Study Analysis 321 Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation