2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of dynamic response of connected and non-connected piled raft systems using shaking table tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fioravante and Giretti [19] used a series of centrifuge model tests to investigate the load transfer mechanisms of PRF and CLPRS and found that PRF acted as a settlement reducer while CLPRS played the role of soil reinforcement. Based on the shaking table tests, Azizkandi et al [20,21] found that PRF and CLPRS efectively reduced the ground settlements. It was also concluded that CLPRS decreased the maximum bending moment of piles by 20%-60%, based on input motion amplitudes and cushion layer material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fioravante and Giretti [19] used a series of centrifuge model tests to investigate the load transfer mechanisms of PRF and CLPRS and found that PRF acted as a settlement reducer while CLPRS played the role of soil reinforcement. Based on the shaking table tests, Azizkandi et al [20,21] found that PRF and CLPRS efectively reduced the ground settlements. It was also concluded that CLPRS decreased the maximum bending moment of piles by 20%-60%, based on input motion amplitudes and cushion layer material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%