2022
DOI: 10.1177/0309524x221092079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of dynamic testing of full-scale wind turbine drivetrains with hardware-in-the-loop

Abstract: Dynamometer testing of full-scale wind turbine drivetrains involves subjecting integrated components to extreme static loads, fatigue loads, or dynamic loads to replicate field conditions. This paper provides a detailed evaluation of the uncertainty and errors in applied loads and measured responses, and their magnitude relative to established repeatability bounds for a drivetrain subjected to static and dynamic loads on the 7.5 MW test bench at the Clemson University Wind Turbine Drivetrain Testing Facility. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum nominal error is approximately 25 kN forces and 25 kNm moments, or roughly 5% of the requested signals' amplitude for a specific test profile [13]. Bibo et al provided a comprehensive assessment of the uncertainty and inaccuracies in applied loads and measured responses, as well as their significance relative to established predefined limits for repetition for a drivetrain exposed to both static and dynamic loads on the 7.5 MW test bench [14]. The experimental results were applied to evaluate the tracking error on the test bench and the cross-coupling occurring between bending moments and forces [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum nominal error is approximately 25 kN forces and 25 kNm moments, or roughly 5% of the requested signals' amplitude for a specific test profile [13]. Bibo et al provided a comprehensive assessment of the uncertainty and inaccuracies in applied loads and measured responses, as well as their significance relative to established predefined limits for repetition for a drivetrain exposed to both static and dynamic loads on the 7.5 MW test bench [14]. The experimental results were applied to evaluate the tracking error on the test bench and the cross-coupling occurring between bending moments and forces [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%