2020
DOI: 10.4103/njms.njms_26_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of efficacy of platelet-rich fibrin membrane and bone graft in coverage of immediate dental implant in esthetic zone: An in vivo study

Abstract: Objective: This study compared and evaluated the clinical and radiographic results of guided bone regeneration using platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and collagen membrane as barrier membrane in immediately placed implants with severe buccal bone defect (with respect to marginal bone level, implant stability quotient [ISQ]), and histological analysis of new bone formation. Materials and Methods: Sixteen implants were placed in patients requiring immediate implant placement an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After reading the full text of those 39 papers, 13 were discarded for not analyzing IIP, 6 for an absence or inadequate control group, 6 for being retrospective observational studies or case reports, 3 studies related to sinus lift, two for not assessing MBL and one for performing flapless procedures. Finally, 8 studies were included in our systematic review [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ] ( Figure 1 ). Only two of the three groups of Alam et al [ 38 ] study were considered in this review (PCs + bone graft group vs. only bone graft group).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…After reading the full text of those 39 papers, 13 were discarded for not analyzing IIP, 6 for an absence or inadequate control group, 6 for being retrospective observational studies or case reports, 3 studies related to sinus lift, two for not assessing MBL and one for performing flapless procedures. Finally, 8 studies were included in our systematic review [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ] ( Figure 1 ). Only two of the three groups of Alam et al [ 38 ] study were considered in this review (PCs + bone graft group vs. only bone graft group).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selected articles were published between 2015 and 2020 [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]. One study was a CCT [ 32 ] and seven studies were RCTS [ 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ]. Three of the selected studies had a split-mouth design [ 32 , 33 , 37 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations