2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10527-018-9776-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Efficacy of White Blood Cell Identification in Peripheral Blood by Automated Scanning of Stained Blood Smear Images with Variable Magnification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, our results showed good agreement between the percentages of normal WBC in pre‐ and post‐classification, quantified by high values of correlation and concordance (between 0.91 and 1). These results are comparable to those obtained with other digital cell morphology analysers as reported by several studies 10,23–26 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, our results showed good agreement between the percentages of normal WBC in pre‐ and post‐classification, quantified by high values of correlation and concordance (between 0.91 and 1). These results are comparable to those obtained with other digital cell morphology analysers as reported by several studies 10,23–26 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These results are comparable to those obtained with other digital cell morphology analysers as reported by several studies. 10,[23][24][25][26] A second aspect to discuss is the MC-80 performance for the DLC obtained on abnormal samples. Abnormal cells are difficult to identify, especially blast cells and ALC, as reported in some external quality control surveys.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%