Evaluation of efficiency index of friction energy dissipation devices using endurance time method

Abstract

Various methods have been presented to improve the performance of buildings against earthquakes. Friction damper device is one of the energy dissipation devices that appropriately absorbs and dissipates the input energy and decreases displacements. In this paper, the possibility of using endurance time method to determine the efficiency index and optimum slip load for these dampers was investigated by comparing the results of endurance time and nonlinear time history analyses. The efficiency indexes acquired from the average of results for nonlinear time history and endurance time analyses were close to each other. In this research, by assuming identical optimum slip load for the dampers in all stories, the normalized damper strength was increased in a number of equal steps ranging from zero to one to determine the efficiency index of dampers in each step. Then, the optimum slip load of dampers in the steel frames was calculated according to the minimum efficiency index of dampers. As a result, employing the endurance time method instead of a high number of nonlinear time history analyses is also possible, and using the endurance time method diminishes 57% of computational endeavors. Lastly, a relation for acquiring the optimum slip load of the friction damper devices in steel structures was proposed in terms of the weight of the structures. After adding optimal FDDs to the structures and investigating the effectiveness of the dampers, it was concluded that by using endurance time excitation function with better energy consistency, the endurance time results could be improved.

Application of Endurance Time Method in Seismic Assessment of RC Frames Designed by Direct Displacement-Based Procedure

“…In fact, the ET method represents the structural response at various IM levels using the least number (commonly three) of NTHA [32], which is conventionally provided by Incremental Dynamic Analysis (IDA). Several studies have been conducted on the ET method in recent years [33][34][35][36][37][38][39], and the validity of ET results has been confirmed by comparing them with the results of NTHA [40][41][42][43][44][45]. These research works compared the results of NTHA under 7 or 22 Ground Motion (GM) records with the ET method results under three simulated Endurance Time Excitation Functions (ETEFs) records.…”