2002
DOI: 10.1260/026635102321049510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Elasto-Plastic Buckling Strength of Two-Way Grid Shells Using Continuum Analogy

Abstract: The present paper aims to propose a method to evaluate elasto-plastic buckling strength of two-way grid shells, using mathematical formulas for linear buckling derived based on the continuum shell analogy. The paper is organised from two principal points of view. In the first discussion, we derive two formulas for linear buckling of two-way grid shells by substituting the equivalent continuum rigidity into the buckling formulas for orthotropic shells. The applicability of the formulas is verified using several… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of two-way elliptic paraboloidal single layer lattice domes, the effects of geometrical imperfections are also large, as discussed in the studies [1,2]. The present study assumes a distribution, W imp (x, y), for geometrical imperfections, where the maximum imperfection is denoted as w i0 .…”
Section: Geometrical Imperfectionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the case of two-way elliptic paraboloidal single layer lattice domes, the effects of geometrical imperfections are also large, as discussed in the studies [1,2]. The present study assumes a distribution, W imp (x, y), for geometrical imperfections, where the maximum imperfection is denoted as w i0 .…”
Section: Geometrical Imperfectionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…2. For a typical example, one value of 1/3 for β is adopted here, since the effects of β are expected not to be so big according to the study [1,2].…”
Section: Loadsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations