Evaluation of ELISA and immunoaffinity fluorometric analytical tools of four mycotoxins in various food categories

Abstract

Mycotoxins (MTs) are secondary toxic metabolites that can contaminate food, impacting quality and safety, leading to various negative health effects and serious pathological consequences conferring urgent need to evaluate and validate the currently standard methods used in their analysis. Therefore, this study was aimed to validate ELISA and VICAM immunoaffinity fluorometric, the two common methods used to monitor the level of MTs according to the Egyptian Organization for Standardization and Quality Control. A total of 246 food samples were collected and tested for Aflatoxins (196 samples), Ochratoxin A (139), Zearalenone (70), and Deoxynivalenol (100) using both analytical methods. Results showed that aflatoxins exceeded limits in 42.9, 100, and 13.3% of oily seeds, dried fruits, and chili and spices, respectively. For ochratoxin A, 3.9% of Gramineae and 8% of spices and chili (locally sourced) exceeded the limits, while 17.6% of imported pasta and noodles exceeded the limits for deoxynivalenol. Significant differences for the aflatoxins and ochratoxin A detection among different categories of chocolate, dried fruits, and oily seeds (p-value < 0.05). No zearalenone contamination was detected in the exported, imported, and locally sourced categories. No deoxynivalenol contamination was detected in the tested Gramineae category. In contrast, for pasta and noodles, the imported samples exhibited the highest contamination rate (above the upper limit of 750 µg/kg) with 17.6% of the samples testing positive for deoxynivalenol with no significant difference among different sample categories of Gramineae, pasta, and noodles (p-value > 0.05). In conclusion, our study found no significant differences between the ELISA and immunoaffinity fluorometric analysis in the detection of the respective MTs in various food categories and therefore, they can substitute each other whenever necessary. However, significant differences were observed among different food categories, particularly the local and imported ones, highlighting the urgent need for strict and appropriate control measures to minimize the risk of MTs adverse effects.

Food-Oral Processing: Current Progress, Future Directions, and Challenges

“…The lack of objective and standardized evaluation methods posed a significant challenge, introducing potential biases stemming from individual differences, language expression, and cultural backgrounds. This subjectivity compromised the reliability of assessment results, highlighting a major limitation in early food–oral processing studies . Finally, early studies had constraints in the scope and sample size of early studies.…”

“…This subjectivity compromised the reliability of assessment results, highlighting a major limitation in early food−oral processing studies. 12 Finally, early studies had constraints in the scope and sample size of early studies. Limited to a few specific foods or ingredients, these studies could not comprehensively represent the characteristics and variations of various food categories.…”