2023
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4355051
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Emergency Evacuation Capacity of Urban Metro Stations Based on Combined Weights and Topsis-Gra Method in Intuitive Fuzzy Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the main defect of this method is that it only uses Euclidean distance as the criterion to judge the advantages and disadvantages of the scheme, and it cannot fully reflect the dynamic changes of the data sequence of the sample or the research object, which is complementary to the grey relational analysis. Although the grey relational analysis method can reflect the advantages and disadvantages of the sample or the investigated object from the dynamic curve of the data, it cannot directly reflect the distance position of the sample [ 17 19 ]. Based on the advantages and disadvantages of TOPSIS evaluation method and grey relational analysis method based on entropy weight, through literature review and practical verification and analysis, the author thinks that grey relational analysis method can effectively make up for the shortcomings of entropy weight method, and combine the two research methods to evaluate the development level of the system better and more accurately, and make a more scientific choice and ranking of evaluation schemes and evaluation objects, which is also a method choice and innovation different from other research results.…”
Section: Urban Low-carbon Economic Development Level Evaluation Model...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the main defect of this method is that it only uses Euclidean distance as the criterion to judge the advantages and disadvantages of the scheme, and it cannot fully reflect the dynamic changes of the data sequence of the sample or the research object, which is complementary to the grey relational analysis. Although the grey relational analysis method can reflect the advantages and disadvantages of the sample or the investigated object from the dynamic curve of the data, it cannot directly reflect the distance position of the sample [ 17 19 ]. Based on the advantages and disadvantages of TOPSIS evaluation method and grey relational analysis method based on entropy weight, through literature review and practical verification and analysis, the author thinks that grey relational analysis method can effectively make up for the shortcomings of entropy weight method, and combine the two research methods to evaluate the development level of the system better and more accurately, and make a more scientific choice and ranking of evaluation schemes and evaluation objects, which is also a method choice and innovation different from other research results.…”
Section: Urban Low-carbon Economic Development Level Evaluation Model...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simultaneously, the Gray method, introducing Gray relational degree among metrics as a distance measure, better reflects internal variations in each scheme, addressing the limitations of TOPSIS. 10 While AHP is widely used to establish standard weights via standard pairwise comparisons and is integrated with various MCDM methods. The primary issue lies in the lack of consistency in pairwise comparisons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%