2016
DOI: 10.1177/1078155215597558
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of empiric antibiotic de-escalation in febrile neutropenia

Abstract: Results of this investigation indicate that broad-spectrum antibiotics can be safely de-escalated to levofloxacin prophylaxis prior to ANC recovery in select patients. This practice may decrease the duration of broad-spectrum antibiotic exposure and associated complications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, Micol et al [16] prematurely interrupted their study in neutropenic patients with acute myeloid leukemia and fever of unknown origin because 3 of 7 patients demonstrated fever relapse within 3 days from antibiotic discontinuation and 1 developed septic shock. However, these results are in contrast with a retrospective study in neutropenic patients and our experience, in which 19% and 17.5% of patients needed subsequent escalation of antibiotics but no case of severe infection (severe sepsis or shock) or death occurred [13]. More importantly, the recent RCT on discontinuation also found no differences in the number of days with fever, severe adverse event, or death noted between the 2 study arms [9].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the contrary, Micol et al [16] prematurely interrupted their study in neutropenic patients with acute myeloid leukemia and fever of unknown origin because 3 of 7 patients demonstrated fever relapse within 3 days from antibiotic discontinuation and 1 developed septic shock. However, these results are in contrast with a retrospective study in neutropenic patients and our experience, in which 19% and 17.5% of patients needed subsequent escalation of antibiotics but no case of severe infection (severe sepsis or shock) or death occurred [13]. More importantly, the recent RCT on discontinuation also found no differences in the number of days with fever, severe adverse event, or death noted between the 2 study arms [9].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Almost all studies have been performed in intensive care units (ICUs), and definitions and timing of de-escalation varied significantly [10]. In addition, only few studies and 1 recent randomized trial have focused on neutropenic cancer patients [9,[11][12][13][14], but very limited data are currently available on the pre-engraftment period in HSCT. The safety of discontinuation of empirical treatment before the resolution of neutropenia has also been a source of debate [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3), though these events were too infrequent to draw definitive conclusions. Kroll et al also retrospectively looked at BSA de-escalation in patients who remained neutropenic after HSCT, but patients could not be de-escalated until after they had already received 14 days of BSA, bringing into question whether this was truly a de-escalation strategy [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary end point was rate of recurrent fever within 72 hours of antimicrobial de-escalation. A 72-hour time frame was chosen as it has been previously utilized in an effort to minimize inclusion of any fever or antimicrobial re-escalation secondary to new infectious and/or noninfectious causes [ 21 ]. This period occurred at a different time point for every individual patient.…”
Section: Outcomes and Trial Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A commonly cited rationale for this is the theoretical concern that stopping broad-spectrum therapy early may increase the potential for recurrent infection and subsequent need for re-escalation of antimicrobials, as cited in an early work by Pizzo and colleagues [ 12 ]. However, these concerns have been demonstrated to be unfounded in several subsequent studies [ 21–23 ].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%