2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of endometrial activin A secretion for prediction of pregnancy after intrauterine insemination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Elevated activin concentrations have been linked to reduced adhesion of the blastocyst to the LE (Stoikos et al 2008). However, others have found higher concentrations of activin A in uterine fluid collected during the periovulatory period in women who became pregnant after intrauterine insemination compared to those that failed to establish a pregnancy (Florio et al 2010). Moreover, using semi-quantitative immunohistochemical techniques, Prakash et al (2006) observed reduced staining for both activin A and FST in women with recurring miscarriages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elevated activin concentrations have been linked to reduced adhesion of the blastocyst to the LE (Stoikos et al 2008). However, others have found higher concentrations of activin A in uterine fluid collected during the periovulatory period in women who became pregnant after intrauterine insemination compared to those that failed to establish a pregnancy (Florio et al 2010). Moreover, using semi-quantitative immunohistochemical techniques, Prakash et al (2006) observed reduced staining for both activin A and FST in women with recurring miscarriages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it was also suggested that endometrial activin A is somehow related to implantation not only by inducing decidualization, but also by regulating uterine matrix metalloproteinases, with potential interactions during decidualization [15]. The local role of activin A with respect to implantation has been recently emphasized [12], suggesting that its local secretion may signal the presence of a receptive endometrium, as revealed by recent data demonstrating that an adequate local secretion of activin A is a prerequisite for endometrial receptivity [7]. The reported increase of endometrial activin A expression and secretion at the time of blastocyst attachment [7,19] may have an important role as a local endometrial phenomenon involved in the fine tuning of trophoblast growth and differentiation to enter the invasive pathway, as well as embryo implantation [20,21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local role of activin A with respect to implantation has been recently emphasized [12], suggesting that its local secretion may signal the presence of a receptive endometrium, as revealed by recent data demonstrating that an adequate local secretion of activin A is a prerequisite for endometrial receptivity [7]. The reported increase of endometrial activin A expression and secretion at the time of blastocyst attachment [7,19] may have an important role as a local endometrial phenomenon involved in the fine tuning of trophoblast growth and differentiation to enter the invasive pathway, as well as embryo implantation [20,21]. In support of this hypothesis is the evidence that activin A is able to regulate the differentiation of proliferative cytotrophoblast into extravillous invasive trophoblast cells of the anchoring villi [7] and, that when added to in-vitro cultured bovine embryos it enhances the expression of genes related to blastocyst hatching and implantation [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The previous studies which have been based on regression analysis only have considered the weights of the independent features to predict the overall pregnancy probability and they have not assessed the interconnection among the features [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Besides, the number of the patients have been studied in the previous researches has been small, these studies have suffered from the lack of statistical power [17,18]. Also, the AUC performance of the previously proposed models for predicting IUI outcome have been low [12].…”
Section: Outcome Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%