2011
DOI: 10.1109/tns.2011.2122267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Energy Loss and Charge Sharing in Cadmium Telluride Detectors for Photon-Counting Computed Tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies based on analytical models or Monte Carlo method usually targeted only one artifact that led to spectral distortions. 17,34,41,45 Therefore, their ability to predict and correct the measured images is limited when the input count rate for a detector is very high. Theoretically, the counting mode of a photon-counting detector can be simulated with either a paralyzable or a nonparalyzable model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies based on analytical models or Monte Carlo method usually targeted only one artifact that led to spectral distortions. 17,34,41,45 Therefore, their ability to predict and correct the measured images is limited when the input count rate for a detector is very high. Theoretically, the counting mode of a photon-counting detector can be simulated with either a paralyzable or a nonparalyzable model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study has suggested that the charge sharing effects should be taken into account when the pixel is smaller than 1 mm 2 . 45 It is thus a major challenge that limits the spatial resolution of a photon-counting detector. Unlike the pulse pileup effect, charge sharing tends to remove counts from the high energy region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases, we assume that the site of charge collection is the same as charge liberation, i.e., no charge diffusion. This may be a reasonable assumption for larger adaptively binned elements and higher threshold levels where the number of double-counting events caused by partial energy absorption in neighboring elements is reduced, as discussed by Xu et al 68 and Lundqvist et al, 16 respectively, but represents an optimistic estimate of detector performance for smaller element sizes.…”
Section: B Charge Liberation and Collectionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Eq. (27). For transition matrices it holds that P i M i;j ¼ 1 since events must be reallocated somewhere.…”
Section: Iiia Basic Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%