2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-012-0883-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of environmental impact produced by different economic activities with the global pollution index

Abstract: The I (GP)* values for each productive unit (i.e. 1.664-2.414) correspond to an 'environment modified by industrial/economic activity within admissible limits, having potential of generating discomfort effects'. The evaluation results are significant in view of future development of each productive unit and sustain the economic production in terms of environment protection with respect to a preventive environment protection scheme and continuous measures of pollution control.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…WW and primary sludge pumping system, existing gritting traps, settlers, associated or not with coagulation-flocculation installation, or other treatment facilities [20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…WW and primary sludge pumping system, existing gritting traps, settlers, associated or not with coagulation-flocculation installation, or other treatment facilities [20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…effluent from primary sedimentation, without coagulation-flocculation in the case of urban WWTP and with additional coagulation-flocculation or stabilisation step in the case of industrial WWTP) or mechanical- biological treatment steps (final effluent from urban WWTP) are presented in Table 6, considering especially some common quality indicators required to be controlled in each compliance plan for comparison with the maximal permitted limits (recommended by environmental controller). of basic aromatic products for alimentary industry, food, flavours as C14-C16 aldehydes, γ and ω lactones, cyclic cetones, esters, glycolates, ntermediate fractions from petroleum products) [20,22], [23] (with WWTP No. 2) aeration/oxidation basin, 2 secondary radial settlers of 35 m in diameter, chemicals used as nutrients (10% industrial lime for pH correction, 10% tri-sodium phosphate, 10% urea); it exists also 1 biofilter (h=4 m, chemically inert granite support, 4-8 cm-material size); for sludge line -(3) sludge evacuation (pumping, recycling) and in-excess sludge treatment (mechanical and gravitational concentration to 6-10% solids, and dewatering); A required standard quality must be related to the treated wastewater when it is used as processing water, or for recycling/reusing goal, and also if is discharged in local receiving watercourse [1,5].…”
Section: Primary Sedimentation Contribution To Reduction Of Ww Pollutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of analyzed quality indicators of Siret River are used in calculation of water quality indexes, EQ i (Eq.1), and also of evaluation scores, ES i , expressed by marks between 1 and 10 attributed based on evaluation scale presented in other authors' researches. 8,9,15,16 EQ i = C i,measured / MAC i (1) in which, i -identification of the specific quality indicator; C i,measuredmeasured/analyzed value of the quality indicator, and MAC i -maximum admissible concentration of the quality indicator in accordance with the imposed limits of local environmental authority/regulator or legislation. (Fig.1).…”
Section: Environmental Impact Assessment Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphical representation of the alternative methodology of global pollution index (I * GP ) (S i -ideal state and S r -real state). 8,9,17,18 The correlation between the global pollution index (I * GP ), real state of aquatic environment of Siret River, and the impact of different activities in Pascani town area is characterized in table 1.…”
Section: Environmental Impact Assessment Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation