2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.07.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Epstein-Barr Virus–Specific Immunologic Response in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With an Enzyme-Linked ImmunoSpot Assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that we did not observe significantly increased levels of T-cell responses to EBV is consistent with the observation that, in our series, no patient developed EBV-related lymphoproliferations, thus preventing the possibility to assess the predictive value of this analysis. Indeed, our results are in line with the observation that EBV-DNA load is generally high in the first year after transplantation in SOT patients with positive EBV-specific T cell responses, when the risk of EBVdriven lymphoproliferative disorders is high (43). Despite T cell responses to "universal" TAAs can be detected also in patients with early stages of cancer (30,31), no significantly higher levels of T-cells specific for TERT and Survivin were detected at baseline or at the time of diagnosis of cancer in the blood of T and NT patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The fact that we did not observe significantly increased levels of T-cell responses to EBV is consistent with the observation that, in our series, no patient developed EBV-related lymphoproliferations, thus preventing the possibility to assess the predictive value of this analysis. Indeed, our results are in line with the observation that EBV-DNA load is generally high in the first year after transplantation in SOT patients with positive EBV-specific T cell responses, when the risk of EBVdriven lymphoproliferative disorders is high (43). Despite T cell responses to "universal" TAAs can be detected also in patients with early stages of cancer (30,31), no significantly higher levels of T-cells specific for TERT and Survivin were detected at baseline or at the time of diagnosis of cancer in the blood of T and NT patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although T cell levels increased after therapeutic reduction of immunosuppressive drugs and rituximab treatment, the magnitude was not different in patients with remission and those requiring additional chemotherapy . Given the still controversial interpretation of EBV loads, further studies of EBV‐specific T cell assays are highly desirable to improve monitoring of patients at risk .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, monitoring of cell-mediated immunity (CMI) using a Quantiferon-CMV assay may be useful predicting late-onset CMV disease once CMV prophylaxis has been stopped [52]. CMI also have been monitored for EBV using an enzyme-linked immunoSpot assay [53]. Immunoglobulin G (IgG), C3, IgG2 levels, and NK cell counts have been proposed as an attempt to identify the risk of infection in heart transplant recipients within the first year [54].…”
Section: Monitoring Infectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%