2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13595-011-0132-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of estimates of crown condition in forest monitoring: comparison between visual estimation and automated crown image analysis

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…, Nakajima et al. , Boehmer et al. ) and has also been used to categorize forest health across Europe by the International Cooperative Program Forest Inventory (Eichhorn et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, Nakajima et al. , Boehmer et al. ) and has also been used to categorize forest health across Europe by the International Cooperative Program Forest Inventory (Eichhorn et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Green canopy levels were visually estimated as a proxy for the species response to drought (die-off) as the percentage of green leaves present relative to the amount in healthy individuals found in the study area. This method is standard for estimations of drought-induced die-off in ecosystems dominated by woody vegetation (Carnicer et al 2011, Galiano et al 2011, Nakajima et al 2011, Boehmer et al 2013) and has also been used to categorize forest health across Europe by the International Cooperative Program Forest Inventory (Eichhorn et al 2016). Green canopy levels were measured in the canopies of the plants that were used to estimate stand density (Appendix S3), but only species with at least 20 individuals within the stand were considered at each site to reduce stochasticity in the estimation of green canopy levels at stand level.…”
Section: Estimation Of Green Canopy Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is standard practice for measures of drought-induced impact on ecosystems dominated by woody vegetation (e.g. Carnicer et Galiano et al, 2011;Nakajima et al, 2011;Boehmer et al, 2013). In order to facilitate comparisons between species that may exhibit different leaf phenologies, the green canopy was estimated by considering the percentage of young, thin tips of branches with no signs of decay and regularly holding up leaves (as well as checking recent leaf scars in species that drop leaves early after unfolding, such as G. scorpius).…”
Section: Recording Field Canopy Diebackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It integrates intrinsic tree genetic variability, site effects, and external factors such as abiotic and biotic stresses. Crown defoliation expresses the percentage of lacking leaves with respect to an ideal healthy tree identified through photo guides (Müller and Stierlin 1990;Ferretti 1994) or local reference tree and it is measured by a proportional scale with 5% steps ranging from 0% (not defoliated) to 100% (dead tree). Alongside crown defoliation, damage symptoms (and, when evident, damaging agents) are currently assessed on leaves, branches, and trunk.…”
Section: The Level I Network In Italymentioning
confidence: 99%