Evaluation of ethical codes implementation – a fuzzy approach

Abstract

Purpose Setting measurable criteria for implementing ethical codes is a pivotal issue in construction organizations. This paper aims to present an approach for evaluating ethical codes implementation within an organization based on 30 indicators for effective implementation of codes of ethics, with the objective of enhancing employees’ ethical behaviour within the organization. Design/methodology/approach This study builds on a theoretical model that was developed using existing classification in the literature, including six processes of ethical codes implementation (process of: identification and removal of barriers, coding, internalization, enacting values, monitoring and accountability). The model was validated by applying partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) estimation approach on questionnaire survey data which were collected from construction practitioners in Hong Kong. Fuzzy synthetic evaluation (FSE) analysis was adopted to assess the level of ethical code implementation. Findings The results of the PLS-SEM indicate a good model fit, and the model has a substantial predictive power and satisfactory model representation. Thus, the model is suitable for measuring or evaluating codes of ethics implementation within organization. The process of “enacting value” has the greatest influence on “ethical code implementation”. The results of FSE indicate that the overall level of implementation of ethical codes is high, but there are rooms for further improvement. Research limitations/implications The response to the self-assessment questionnaire used for measuring the extent of implementation is relatively low, but it was adequate for statistical analyses considering the fact that it represents the second stage of data collection in a longitudinal manner, and only the respondents who participated in the initial questionnaire survey were asked to participate. The essence of doing this is to test the model for the purpose of self-evaluation of construction organizations regarding codes implementation. Thus, the outcomes are not representative enough for the entire construction organizations in Hong Kong. However, the model was tested to demonstrate how to reflect the strengths and weaknesses of construction companies in Hong Kong with respects to ethical code implementation to identify areas requiring improvement. Practical implications Facilities managers can benefit from the findings of this study by applying the model to assess ethical codes implementation within the organization to enhance ethical behaviour. Originality/value The main contribution of this study is the generation of a framework for measuring the extent of implementation of ethical codes within construction organizations. The contribution from this study can add significant value to facilities management discipline as well, being a business-oriented sector. As ethical behaviour plays an important role in delivering various facilities. The approach used in this study is useful for facilities managers in the process of implementing codes of ethics.

Evaluating the effect of new working practices on office space usage in Hong Kong

“…At this stage, convergent validity was determined by examining the measurement scale to see if all the items are loaded above the threshold value of 0.50 on their associated constructs, and if there is any cross-loading of items i.e. any item loading higher on other constructs more than the construct it supposed to measure (Hair et al , 2010; Ho and Oladinrin, 2016). The result of the preliminary analysis showed that one item (NWPI7) loaded below the threshold score (0.5), and was removed from the analysis.…”

Attitudes Toward a Code of Ethics: a Comparison between Academic and Non-Academic Staff

“…Scholars have proposed various ideas of what the names of an ethical code are, ranging from code of ethics, code of conduct, business principles, corporate credo, code of practice and a value statement even though the most commonly used terms are "code of ethics" and "code of conduct" (Ho & Oladinrin, 2016). In terms of definitions, the code has been explained in many ways.…”

“…There are two common terms relating the management of a code of ethics namely, implementation and embeddedness. Code implementation describes the degree to which an organization put its efforts to make the code conveyed and its compliance ensured whereas code embeddedness refers to the extent to which the code is integrated into the culture of the organization (McCabe et al, 1996;Oladinrin & Ho, 2016). Therefore, the attitudes toward the code in this research referred the attitudes of the staff regarding the embeddedness and the implementation of the code in their institution.…”

Ethical Management in Companies in the Czech Republic and Ukraine - Comparison of the Presence of a Code of Ethics

“…Ho and Oladinrin [1]; Kaptein [2] show, a code of ethics is a basic element of the ethical infrastructure of an organization. Its acceptance covers the application of formal documents, in which the explicit declaration of the values that should steer the behaviour of employees and managers and support good practices and indicators related to the core of the organization, can be found.…”