2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of evaporation estimation methods for a covered reservoir in a semi-arid climate (south-eastern Spain)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideally, the Q t should be computed based on the water temperature profile data as detailed in e.g. Gianniou and Antonopoulos (2007) and Gallego-Elvira et al (2012). This requirement was met for all lakes except Lake Tahoe and Ross Barnett Reservoir.…”
Section: Testing Sites and Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, the Q t should be computed based on the water temperature profile data as detailed in e.g. Gianniou and Antonopoulos (2007) and Gallego-Elvira et al (2012). This requirement was met for all lakes except Lake Tahoe and Ross Barnett Reservoir.…”
Section: Testing Sites and Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 uses net irradiance (R n, in W m -2 ), ground heat flux (G, in W m -2 ), dry air density (ρ a , in kg m -3 ), the specific heat capacity of air (c p , in J kg -1 K -1 ), the vapor pressure deficit of air (e s -e a, in Pa), the rate of change of saturation specific humidity with air temperature (Δ, in Pa K -1 ), the psychrometric constant (γ, in Pa K -1 ), and surface and aerodynamic resistances (r s and r a , in s m -1 ) to calculate the energy rate of water evaporation (E, in g s -1 m -2 ) multiplied with the latent heat of vaporization (λ, in J g -1 ). Due to complications and the need for several parameters, this equation has been simplified in many different ways (Linacre 1977;Salama et al 2015;Gallego-Elvira et al 2012). Linacre (1977) This includes R as a daily range of temperature and R ann as the difference between the mean temperatures of the coldest and hottest months (values in °C).…”
Section: Drying Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.3 with annual evaporative losses for uncovered surface E = 1.6 m yr −1 (see Table 3) and estimated cover efficiency ε = 0.8. Considering water price w = 1 USD m −3 (e.g., seawater reverse osmosis costs are in the range of 0.5 to 3 USD m −3 Gilau and Small, 2008;Guler et al, 2015) floating cover cost P c = 5 USD m −2 (based on commercially available HDPE floating balls) and cover maintenance cost P m = 0.1 USD m −2 yr −1 , the economic efficiency of such floating elements for a period of 5 years is ∼ 1 USD m −2 . Hence, for a reservoir with 100 × 100 m 2 surface area, water costs savings equivalent to USD 10 000 are feasible for a 5-years operation (along with 64 000 m 3 of water protected from evaporation).…”
Section: Costs and Water Savingmentioning
confidence: 99%