2019
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Existing Stress–Strain Models and Modeling of PET FRP–Confined Concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the prediction effect of ultimate strain is far less than that of ultimate stress. Similar trends have also been reported in previous studies on FRP-confined NSC Bai et al (2019); Pimanmas and Saleem, (2019); Yuan et al (2022b). First, the stress measurement technique is more reliable than the strain measurement technique, and the strain measurement may be affected by the premature failure of the sample.…”
Section: Forecasting Model Modificationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, the prediction effect of ultimate strain is far less than that of ultimate stress. Similar trends have also been reported in previous studies on FRP-confined NSC Bai et al (2019); Pimanmas and Saleem, (2019); Yuan et al (2022b). First, the stress measurement technique is more reliable than the strain measurement technique, and the strain measurement may be affected by the premature failure of the sample.…”
Section: Forecasting Model Modificationsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…An AR value greater than 1 means overestimation whereas underestimation is related to an AR value smaller than 1. AAR and AR are calculated using Equations ( 4) and ( 5), respectively [75].…”
Section: Peak Axial Strain Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%