2016
DOI: 10.2217/nnm-2015-0023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Expansile Nanoparticle Tumor Localization and Efficacy in a Cancer Stem Cell-Derived Model of Pancreatic Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

Abstract: eNPs are a promising tool for the detection and treatment of PPC.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, characterization via dynamic light scattering (DLS) suggested a mean diameter of >200 nm for all particles with a significantly larger average diameter (~360 nm) for the 2% HRF-eNPs (Figure 1a,c). The disparity in results between these two methods are in agreement with previous reports 31,32 and are attributed to the bias toward a low number of larger (100–400 nm) nanoparticles that skew DLS results. An in-depth discussion of the factors that lead to DLS bias toward larger particles ( i.e.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, characterization via dynamic light scattering (DLS) suggested a mean diameter of >200 nm for all particles with a significantly larger average diameter (~360 nm) for the 2% HRF-eNPs (Figure 1a,c). The disparity in results between these two methods are in agreement with previous reports 31,32 and are attributed to the bias toward a low number of larger (100–400 nm) nanoparticles that skew DLS results. An in-depth discussion of the factors that lead to DLS bias toward larger particles ( i.e.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…20 Moreover, these results are consistent with our previously published findings in an identical model of PDAC-PC demonstrating time-dependent eNP accumulation, wherein 1 h after injection the fluorescent eNPs were still in the peritoneal fluid and not localized to tumors; in contrast, 4 h after injection, tumor localization was significant with negligible particle fluorescence in the peritoneal fluid. 31 By 24 h, tumor localization was prominent with no residual fluorescence in the peritoneal fluid. 31 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations