2021
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11020166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Eye-Pain Severity between Dry-Eye Subtypes

Abstract: The aim of this study was to assess eye pain between dry eye (DE) subtypes using questionnaires and the PainVision® (Osachi) apparatus. This study involved 52 eyes of 52 DE patients with eye pain (43 females and 9 males; mean age: 64.2 ± 13.2 (mean ± SD) years) who were classified into three DE subtypes (aqueous deficient DE (ADDE); decreased wettability DE (DWDE); and increased evaporation DE (IEDE)) based on fluorescein breakup pattern. In all subjects, severity of eye pain was evaluated using PainVision®, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At day 1, day 15 ± 2, day 29 ± 2, and day 57 ± 2, symptoms were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS; range, 0-100 points, with 0 = no discomfort and 100 = maximal discomfort), a tool widely used for measuring subjective symptoms for the severity of eye dryness and symptoms (burning/stinging sensation, sticky feeling, foreign body sensation, itching, blurred vision, sensitivity to light, and pain). These symptoms are commonly evaluated in clinical studies of DED . DED severity was also assessed using a valid and reliable instrument, the OSDI questionnaire, consisting of 12 questions (total score range, 0-100, with higher scores representing a worse condition) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At day 1, day 15 ± 2, day 29 ± 2, and day 57 ± 2, symptoms were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS; range, 0-100 points, with 0 = no discomfort and 100 = maximal discomfort), a tool widely used for measuring subjective symptoms for the severity of eye dryness and symptoms (burning/stinging sensation, sticky feeling, foreign body sensation, itching, blurred vision, sensitivity to light, and pain). These symptoms are commonly evaluated in clinical studies of DED . DED severity was also assessed using a valid and reliable instrument, the OSDI questionnaire, consisting of 12 questions (total score range, 0-100, with higher scores representing a worse condition) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These symptoms are commonly evaluated in clinical studies of DED. 21,[23][24][25] DED severity was also assessed using a valid and reliable instrument, the OSDI questionnaire, consisting of 12 questions (total score range, 0-100, with higher scores representing a worse condition). 26 Signs were assessed by tCFS score using the National Eye Institute scale (range, 0-15, with higher scores representing a worse condition).…”
Section: Clinical Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, PainVision ® (PS-2100; Nipro Corporation, Osaka, Japan), a new painless electrical stimulation system for the quantitative assessment of pain intensity via substituting pain with a different sensory stimulation, has been developed and is currently mainly being used in the field of anesthesiology and in pain clinics in Japan [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. In a recent study [ 20 ], we used PainVision ® to evaluate EP in DE cases, and we found that the system allowed for easy measurement and assessment of pain and an analysis of its correlation with objective findings. Moreover, we found that the objective finding most significantly associated with EP was the classification of DE subtypes [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important aspect is that, apart from differences in clinical features, the different FBUP types of DED also differ in terms of subjective discomfort of the patient and it is important to know how these aspects correlate each with other. Therefore, analysis of eye pain between dry eye (DE) subtypes using questionnaires and the PainVision ® (Osachi) apparatus was performed [12] and revealed that greater severity of eye pain was found in aqueous-deficient DE and decreased wettability DE than in increased evaporation DE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two studies [11,12] represent a very important clinically applicable development of the FBUPs diagnostic test for DED subgroups and are of immediate interest both for the clinician and for the basic scientist in the field of dry eye and tear film studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%