1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00468-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Five QT Correction Formulas Using a Software-Assisted Method of Continuous QT Measurement from 24-Hour Holter Recordings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate and compare QTc formulae in 21 healthy subjects, MOLNAR et al [26] used 24-h Holter monitoring, as it allows the assessment of QT intervals over a large range of rates. QT-RR relationships for individuals and the group were fitted by regression analysis to five QT prediction formulas: simple Bazett's, modified Bazett's, linear (Framingham), modified Fridericia's and exponential (Sarma's).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To evaluate and compare QTc formulae in 21 healthy subjects, MOLNAR et al [26] used 24-h Holter monitoring, as it allows the assessment of QT intervals over a large range of rates. QT-RR relationships for individuals and the group were fitted by regression analysis to five QT prediction formulas: simple Bazett's, modified Bazett's, linear (Framingham), modified Fridericia's and exponential (Sarma's).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison with other studies, the QT interval was corrected for heart rate. It is well known that Bazett's formula is inaccurate at higher heart rates [26]. It overcorrects at faster heart rates and undercorrects at lower heart rates.…”
Section: Study Limitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of correction methods exists that attempt to normalize QT intervals to an RR interval of 1000 ms, corresponding to a heart rate of 60 beats per minute. [52][53][54][55] While ECG measurements directly evaluate the effect of a particular test compound on the QT interval, they may not be the best choice to evaluate the potential off-target activity of a class of compounds on hERG channels since other factors may affect the QT interval and either obscure an effect on I Kr or complicate the interpretation of the results. 56 …”
Section: Evaluation Of Cardiac Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QT intervals obtained were modified according to heart rate using Bazett's formula (QTc = QT/RR 1/2 ). 16,17) QT dispersion (QTd) was found by subtracting the shortest QT interval from the longest QT interval calculated on the 12-lead ECG (QTd = QT max -QT min ). Corrected QTd (QTdc) was obtained by subtracting the minimum QTc from the maximum QTc (QTdc = QTc max -QTc min ).…”
Section: Vol 44 Nomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corrected QTd (QTdc) was obtained by subtracting the minimum QTc from the maximum QTc (QTdc = QTc max -QTc min ). 16,17) Echocardiographic investigations: Echocardiographic investigations were conducted before the conventional treatment, after standardization of that treatment (values obtained after the conventional treatment were regarded as baseline data), and at the end of the 12-week period during which the spironolactone-metoprolol treatment was continued. Echocardiographic studies were conducted using an Acuson Sequa 515 (Minnesota, USA) from the standard angle and windows.…”
Section: Vol 44 Nomentioning
confidence: 99%