2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of five strategies to limit the impact of fouling in permeable reactive barriers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Available Fe 0 materials are obtained from various sources [8][9][10][11][12] and are supposed to satisfy design expectations [7,[13][14][15][16][17]. However, there is no standard method to access the suitability of Fe 0 materials for individual applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available Fe 0 materials are obtained from various sources [8][9][10][11][12] and are supposed to satisfy design expectations [7,[13][14][15][16][17]. However, there is no standard method to access the suitability of Fe 0 materials for individual applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fe 0 PRBs are currently believed to create redox conditions for contaminant degradation or immobilization [2]. Accordingly, the precipitation of iron corrosion products and other secondary minerals is regarded as perturbing side effect yielding reactivity and porosity loss [2,14,16,17].…”
Section: Current Design Approach To Limit Fe 0 Prb Cloggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, the precipitation of iron corrosion products and other secondary minerals is regarded as perturbing side effect yielding reactivity and porosity loss [2,14,16,17]. Accordingly, the design of a PRB requires profound knowledge of local water flow velocity (residence time), aquifer porosity, influent contaminant concentration.…”
Section: Current Design Approach To Limit Fe 0 Prb Cloggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations