2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Flexural properties of the U-shape Composite Spring.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As compared to neat UD‐CFRP, improvement of 4.9% and 11.8% for flat and curved specimens, respectively, is reported (Figure 2(a)). The flexural strength in the curved portion is increased due to the prestressed CF in a bent position 38 . The flexural modulus also depicted the same trend with a peak value of 85.2 and 62.2 GPa at 0.3% GO content for flat and curved UD‐CFRP composites, respectively (Figure 2(b)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As compared to neat UD‐CFRP, improvement of 4.9% and 11.8% for flat and curved specimens, respectively, is reported (Figure 2(a)). The flexural strength in the curved portion is increased due to the prestressed CF in a bent position 38 . The flexural modulus also depicted the same trend with a peak value of 85.2 and 62.2 GPa at 0.3% GO content for flat and curved UD‐CFRP composites, respectively (Figure 2(b)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The flexural strength typically relies on the local density of microdefects in this region. Different geometries have different distribution of microdefects, which reduces the reliability of strength measurement by this method 38,40 . The four‐point bending applies a uniform bending moment in the region between the two loading noses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%